Category: bathrooms

Getting hosed

The virus got hosed by the City of San Diego.

The city announced (see image below) that to “combat a Hepatitis C outbreak” from the Human Immunodeficiency Hepatitis C Virus, that they will be, get this, adding bathrooms on the streets and power washing the sidewalks with a bleach solution.

Who knew that bleach kills viruses!

Side effect – the killing off by combat of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus as well, which again takes us to the simple fact that MPPI (Medical Science Populist Ideas) don’t seem to ever accurately portray…….viruses can be killed by bleach even though viruses are dead things, even though no virus is a living thing.

Bacteria, fungus, parasites, they are living things.

People who have to go to the bathroom on the streets and businesses and residents around these areas have for decades have begged the city to install more PUBLIC TOILETS so that the sidewalks would not smell of piss but they often will not because the trend has been in order to stop sex from occurring in public and to “curb disease and spread of HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV to close toilets at night, lock some permanently, and remove some.

Feature image of city sidewalks by By 123df (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (], via Wikimedia Commons

Other image found on the City of San Diego Twitter feed on September 18, 2017

HB2-2 and body parts

I am proposing a new House Bill to force people to have the same parents they had when they were born to coincide with the bill in North Carolina that wants to force people to use bathrooms they used when they were born in light of news that North Carolina repealed a lot of HB2 after seeing so much money leave the state when they put that in place originally and people and corporations boycotted.

The thing is, when we listen to our supposed LGBT representatives talk to the press, they whine about it being all wrong, that we have 4 more years of this crap, and all the same old LGBT distortions, while at least one news group reported some of the facts without the drama, NPR which stated:

According to Moore and Berger, the bill leaves regulation of “multi-occupancy facilities to the state,” and puts in place a “temporary moratorium on local ordinances similar to Charlotte’s until December 1, 2020 to allow federal litigation to play out.”

To allow federal litigation play out.

See, the drama LGBT’s don’t emphasize this but it’s very important to understand the problems with a state and it’s legal liabilities if it were to repeal it entirely.

Federal litigation once completed sets the precedent for States to follow and governors and representatives of those states to then relax, knowing exactly where the issue stands on that higher level of governing. It’s a bit like what happened with GAY marriage (notice it’s not LGBT marriage) where the states had their reasons to not make changes until there was a federal ruling.

If a state that’s very conservative chooses to go all out and let the liberal position be in place, before they know that precedent, if it were to not be set in favor of the liberal view, there could be lawsuits a flying everywhere regarding if a decision was made to protect fully transgendered individuals. Lawsuits from businesses that would then claim the state misled them, forcing them to remodel bathrooms, or add new ones, and all sorts of things. The state also doesn’t want the cities to “do their own thing” which is why they blocked the cities for 4 years while it plays out. It’s about protecting everyone from legal harm as this gets resolved in higher courts.

So on to my proposed bill HB2-2:

There will be no confusion about a change in parent’s bodies. A provision of the bill will also force people to live in the same house they were born with and automobile they were born with as to not offend anyone who would not like seeing a change in their auto bodies. This would be a particularly offensive situation having an offensive auto body showing up in the parking lot of the Beverly Hilton.

Also added to the bill is a provision removing the requirement for people to visit hairstylists based on their gender, making it so that a man only can go to a barber, and a woman going to a salon. Men in women’s salons causes confusion, offends, and is dangerous.

Also of note, mothers used to freely bring their small boys in the woman’s bathroom when they had to pee, choosing rather than letting the small boy in the men’s room alone with those of same gender because “that’s what’s safer” as the law puts it, choosing to violate the law and do what they thought was best for the child. Daddies also took their little girls to the men’s room, which is against the law with HB2, a serious violation at that. This new version will be rigorously enforced. HB2-2 adds more tax payer funding for more bathroom police first positioned at Targets, then expanded elsewhere.

It does not matter that North Carolina will lose billions if they keep these bathroom laws in place, libtards are idiots. Funding for these bathroom police that will throw mommies and daddies in jail will come from federal grants which comes in great part from populated and richer states such as California.

All this thanks to the ultra libtartive Bepublican party, always looking out for you, your body parts, and auto parts.


Image of a body part that may have not been original. This car which may be female or male, is not prevented from visiting whatever body shop it wants where it may have it’s outer covers removed, exposing itself to both men and women which some say is dangerous. Photo also illustrates the rear quarter panel which can be changed as can minds, and was created by User:Interiot – Self-captured, CC BY-SA 3.0,

First intersexual birth certificate issued

WOO/HOO my liberal side applauds!

Now my stupid gay dictatorship has to add an “I” to the gayquasion, they have to call it GLBTI/QWERTY not just LGBT/STUPID

“So which bathroom does the INTERSEXUAL use oh great one” we ask the tards in government decision making who represent whiners in the public that demand people use the bathroom according to their birth certificate, the men’s? The womens? The intermen’s?


Stanisława Walasiewicz was one of those intersexuals, as stated on

“…. a star track athlete, who’s life ended during an armed robbery in Cleveland, on 4 December 1980.[16] An autopsy showed that she had no uterus, an abnormal urethra, and a non-functioning, underdeveloped penis, although some sources suggest she also displayed female characteristics.[17][18][19] Chromosome analysis revealed that most of her cells contained normal X and Y chromosomes but some were X0 (containing only one X chromosome), resulting in XY gonadal dysgenesis.[3]

Cosmopolitan published this:

intersexual-birth-certificate honors all sexuals regardless of race, religious or athiest preference, social media platform, or bathroom choice.

Featured image of Stanislawa Walasiewicz By Anonymous ( [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons


Target on target

Target is adding separate private bathrooms that don’t have issues with gender identity. That means these bathrooms will not be Fundamentalist Christians that whack their Bibles over the heads of lawmakers and people who want to piss in the right places. Hooray!

Each bathroom according to their investors report will cost shareholders about 3 to 4 cents per share of stock they own. So those who are multi millionaires that own gobs of shares, will effectively be paying more to help alleviate these concerns about gender changing individuals. I mean it’s not like they get a bill for this, it’s just that it’s costing the company that much in share value. I would guess that most multi-gobholders are conservative? That’s just a guess though.

Speaking of changing, people routinely change clothes and dressing rooms don’t seem to have an issue about transclothing identity, and people change identities to entertain us better with their movies and other show business paraphernalia yet transthumperers don’t make an issue of that. Gee why? Is it that it’s not in the Bible, or is it that such issues are pretty stupid as they are all about material stuff and God doesn’t really care about the body, he cares about the soul, and souls don’t have any gender.

In other words, now think about this, if souls don’t have gender, there is no issue in the eyes of God. Maybe in the eyes of the Bible there is, but we don’t worship the Bible, do we?

So the total cost of each of these 265 new bathrooms (one for every store that doesn’t have one) is about $65,000 each. I say send the bill to Bible publishers and bible pushers. They are the ones that started all this.

Also, I wonder how many homes could have been bought (instead of store bathrooms) with 3 to 4 cents per share? Hmm, that comes out to, for a $65,000 home, 265 of them.

I mean like why solve the homeless problem when what this country really needs is more bathrooms!

Image credit by Cmglee (Own work)


Interesting article on sting operations, like the one that stung George Michael in a Beverly Hills bathroom in the 1980’s. I think it is scientifically referred to as EN/TRAP/MENT. Charges were dropped against a man who was arrested for LEWD/CONDUCT.

“The presence and tactics of the decoy officers actually caused the crimes to occur,” Dhanidina ruled.

LA Times artle also stated “Dhanidina said Long Beach’s vice tactics are discriminatory because the squad uses only male officers as undercover decoys in lewd conduct stings.”


Fox News anchor skewers North Carolina governor on absurd transgender bathroom fears

The video presents what we rarely see, a conservative news channel acting quite liberal.

One of the arguments based on fear is that they don’t want men going into a “ladies room” and exposing themselves or I guess equally of concern would be women going into the “men’s room” and exposing themselves. Let’s look at this concern for a moment, if a woman dressed like a man goes into a men’s room, are they going to use the urinal which sometimes does not have partitions? No, they are going to use a private stall. There are always private stalls in American rest rooms. If the man dressed as a woman’ goes into that place to relieve one’s self of bodily fluids there certainly are not going to piss standing up and possibly expose themselves to little girls because there are no urinals, they would use the stall. There really is no issue other than that of fear which is Satanic and all good Christians should rebuke fear as per their Bible.

Speaking on bodily fluids for a moment, what if that transgender has the HI virus? When they flush their bodily fluids those viruses could be exposed to the air and transmitted airily. It would be a concern if there actually was a VC (viral cause) relationship but we all know now that there isn’t but those who cling onto this other fear of disease transmission should be equally terrified. Some may be. Others like me who have rebuked Satanic fears of viruses are not concerned as we know that the virus theory is bunk.

In the interview the governnor quotes “an expectation of privacy” is the issue but really there is no change in the privacy. Even in locker rooms, unless if there is only a community shower, the issue of privacy is nil as anyone who wants to make sure they are private and not exposed can wear a towel or swimsuit. Many showers are stalled anyway in most places like in health clubs so where is the issue? In the minds of those who create them!

Let’s hear what a liberal red neck has to say about the world’s bathrooms

Self identify here

The bathroom non-issue has brought out pastors of self righteous churches and other self righteous types doing you tube videos. So one is a guy who goes in to a Target armed with his trusty video camera and says to the cashier “If i self identify as a Target employee can i get a discount?” Apparently this is some kind of logic thing, to try to point out “how absurd it is to allow men in women’s rest rooms”. Of course the Target people say that he’s not an employee so he can’t get an employee discount because only people who work at Target get discounts.

He then ends up talking to a manager and the manager says that to get a discount you have to have a discount card and an employee number but the guy keeps presenting how he can go into the ladies room by just “self identifying” as a woman so he should be able to self identify as a Target employee.

What a stupid argument. That would mean that he could also self identify as a police officer and arrest people, he could self identify as a building inspector and approve plans that he knows nothing about, the logic is lame. We are talking about taking a piss, it’s a simple thing, everyone does it, no special training required, and treating people with respect enough to allow them to piss where they feel more comfortable which generally is going to be where they identify as, such as a guy dressed like a woman would be more comfortable as would those in that bathroom in the ladies room.

Getting a discount is not a basic human need, using a bathroom is a basic human need. Accommodations must be made. There are issues where a man dressed like a woman, or vice a vers a, are better served by using their best judgement as to which bathroom would be more appropriate and SAFE for them. The issue is mostly one of safety and in the United States we take safety as a priority. Men have had the shit beat out of them for being in a men’s room dressed like a woman. Making laws that stricktify using bathrooms according to birth gender puts people in real danger at times.

Human needs must be accommodated and if a person feels most comfortable in a bathroom that is prejudice against men, they must be allowed to use it based on human needs first and foremost. Never mind how those in the bathroom self identify with being treated without respect, it’s all about the transgendered person.

Then there’s the anti-abortion guy that goes into the store and preaches how homos are shameful and ranting with his bright yellow fluorescent t-shit that says abortion is murder screaming at everyone in the store about the bathroom policy, isn’t this fun.

It seems all the hicks are fuming, you know because it’s in their Bibles to do so, so while they demand their religious freedom to not serve cakes to gays, or take gay photos at gay weddings, they want their separate bathrooms too.

It’s all so stupid, how do you enforce such a law that forbids men from going into women’s rest rooms, have penis and vagina checks? Present ID whenever you go to pee? (ID in this case does not stand for immune deficiency)

Their freak show argument about safety of little children is bogus, already we have gay men commingling in rest rooms with boys and the boys come out of the rest room with no problems. We have lesbians commingling with little girls in restrooms with no problem. There really isn’t a problem. All people want to do is piss and be comfortable and not be killed or fisted.

Piss on it. Homo men and women make up say 10% of the population. The transgender issue is even  is even fewer since they make up less than .3% of the population so what’s the fucking problem. It’s exaggerated by drama queens everywhere.

So there’s this totally cute hick guy in Tennessee with his big 4×4 Macho Ram truck ranting how the country is going to hell (he’s a Jesus freak) and how if he catches a man in the bathroom with his little girls that he’d [beat the shit out of him or worse] which I gather might mean kill him? Yea that’s reasonable logic isn’t it and that coming from Highways and Hedges Ministries Evangelist Andrew Green…….God’s love pouring out all over the place. Rrrrrright.

Then in his other notable videos on the tube like “I caught my daughter playing with a black kid” his view of God’s love was dripping all over racial identity. He saw her playing with the black kid and he took a picture and said he thought “it was the cutest moment” and talks about racism in America and how horrible it is because we were all created the same in the image of Jesus, all except black and white transsexuals and transvestites of course. No prejudice there.

I wonder if his daughter self identified as a black kid when they were playing. What if his kid met a transgender kid would he find that cute? Probably not? Maybe that kid’s father would have had the shit beat out of him?

God’s love is great. I guess we mostly find it in a fist either figuratively or literally?

And get this, he features a video against bullying!

One has to wonder, does a fist have a right to choose which bathroom it wants to hit someone with?

Issue identify

Everyone has issues. I dentify that people have issues. Issues even have issues, mostly with the people that create them.

The conservatives in North Carolina who pass gass and pass bathroom laws have issues with men “changing their sex” to woman and then using a woman’s rest room. Why? Because they are stupid and read their Bibles too much and listen to huckster preachers.

A nation that depends on hypocrites to write laws is pretty stupid. These people do not literally do what their Bibles tell them to do so why do they literally write laws that same way? No one does what their Bibles tell them to do such as sacrifice humans yet they sacrifice human rights all the time as they claim that the laws will protect us. This is what they believe about their Biblical Law, that it must be obeyed, yet again, when you look at what they do, they break Biblical Law all the time so why are these people writing our laws especially for things that only God understands, and not them, transgenders.

Here are a few points I wanted to highlight and comment on or clarify from an article found here.

WHEN a man gets “the surgery” that lops off their dick their birth certificate doesn’t just magically change AND the states have different policies regarding changing one’s sex on a birth certificate THEN it can take months for the process and paperwork to complete SO what is the now woman supposed to do hold it for 3 months?
SO now a woman she decides to break the law and use the woman’s bathroom THIS violates law like violating the old testament bathroom laws TRANSVESTITE made a decision based on her personal religious beliefs and evaluation of what felt best for her according to her religion so now that religious freedoms are protected she gets to use the bathroom of her choice THAT is what needs to take precedent, individual choice and religious freedoms in this case, but not necessarily in all cases we would look at