Category: perception

Gender reclusive

The subway system authority of New York City called the Metropolitan Transit Authority – which should be acronymized for ease of speech as SSA/MTA/NYC – is replacing “ladies and gentlemen” announcements on it’s PA (Prince Albert or public addressers not sure which) with so called “gender neutral” statements.

I guess genders are offensive.

“The Metropolitan Transportation Authority wants to nix the phrase “ladies and gentlemen” in New York City subway and bus announcements and replace it with gender-inclusive language.”[1]

This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

There are two genders, female, male, how does one include any others by using different terms?

There are not any other genders in the entire world, well maybe one, those who are both male and female, which is one. In that case that rider can be referred to as either appropriately. Even if that rider prefers to be referred to as one of the genders, saying “ladies and gentlemen” is appropriate.

For those who HNG (Have No Gender) let them pick one. Let us be democratic instead of neurotic and go with the majority of how biology works.

So the terms the MTA will “appropriately” use instead are: “passengers”, “riders”, and “everyone”.[1]

Passenger viruses ride on subways.

I am not like everyone. I do not want to be associated with those neutered terms.

I do not consider myself a “passenger” or an “everyone”.

I am offended by neutral language.

Feature image of the initial construction of the London subway system where they would have laughed at such changes in how we refer to ladies and gentlemen is in the public domain is by Percy William Justyne living from 1812 to 1883, and was published February 2 1861.

references: [1] Pix11.com


Lipstuck

Try that sample of lipstick in the department store and you being a LGBTQI could get stuck with a sample of herpes.

Of course “authorities” in the fields of virus studies will say that you can’t get HIV from lipstick, cups, toilets, mosquitoes, or the air, because the virus dies when exposed to air and mosquito syringes are too small for the virus to enter or whatever made up story they tell you but if their claims were true wouldn’t herpes die too on lipstick?

Viruses are not living things.

HIV can be sneezed out of the lungs or when someone shits in the toilet the HIV that’s there can be flush/sprayed into the air so anyone can get it.

VIRUSES ARE STUPID PARTICLES LIKE DUST

The reason we are where we are is politics and terror hysteria which came into play in the dark ages. That time began in George Orwell’s 1984 when Margaret Heckler announced “The probable cause of AIDS is HIV”.

Probable. Not absolute. At least the government health secretary didn’t say absolute they knew enough to not claim that at the time.

So since it was claimed “probable” media hype took hold, interviews were done asking what do you think about this, and all responses were assuming “it” was the cause of 29 different diseases labeled under a broader category stupidly referred to as acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Now it’s considered real.

AIDS, what a stupid name. Actually it’s not a name at all it’s a description/category/broader.

If a virus was the cause of 29 different diseases called AIDS that prior to Hysteria In Virology they had different causes, we would see anyone kissing or trying on lipstick  or breathing air getting it.

Image snapshot of Huffpost article dated 10/31/17. This publication used to be called Huffington Post.

Feature image of lipstick by Stephencdickson


Photos are inkblots

To the wacked out libtards that hate Trump, this photo is where Trump is about to burn this flag as he hates the PXZLYLGBT community.

To those of us with a brain that functions superbly we see a President who supports the rainbow community.

Feature image was seen here https://www.gofundme.com/deplorable-pride in the comments area.


Fat faggot

I’m speaking of a large cigarette of course.

Milo was speaking of a professor.

I’m getting to like this guy again.

Take a look at this awesome suit he wore speaking (calling out) at a University in recent video.

He trashes a fat ass gay liberal professor calling him a ‘piece of shit’.

You go fag!

Hey he even gets awards presented at UC Irvine!

Feature image of fat ass fag credit By Cyberjunkie (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC BY 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)], via Wikimedia Commons


His 2 cents

I was searching for an image of “2 cents” and came across this article by a guy who claims he is “HIV positive” and feel sorry for him, not because “he has the virus” because I know that viruses are dead things not capable of waging war on cells, but because he doesn’t know what I know.

It’s like so much of the population’s mind is stuck with this “it’s like this and only like this” mentality about viruses, basically because that’s all they have ever seen on TV or heard from their doctors and friends and it makes me sad to see the world like this.

It’s like how in searching for that image to represent “my two cents” which is a series of words that represent an idea “my thoughts” or “my opinion” which we can acronymize like this “MTC” one would have an image of both opinions and 2 US cents.

Yet I can go tell people that what they’ve been told about HIV is not exactly accurate, in fact pretty much false, and I can also tell them that their image in their minds of what 2 cents would look like as compared to mine in what I am representing here would also be wrong, and they would argue with me until they are angry and disgusted with my argument and walk away, knowing that they are right and there is only one way of looking at what 2 cents or “HIV” looks like.

That is why I featured this article with an image of 2 cents which is not in two coins, it’s one.

To prove that things are not always as they appear in ones’ minds.

So here’s my 4 cents showing that I know 2 times as much as most people on these subjects.

To make it perfectly clear I have included 2 images of one 2 cent piece, yet one may have to ask “Does this mean he/she is presenting 4 cents or does it just mean he/she is/am representing 2 cents 2 times or is this a representation of merely the same 2 cents being expressed in opinions?”

images of 2 cent piece minted by United States government in 1865, first is the reverse side, second is the reverse side

As with everything in life we can easily misperceive what is being discussed, in the case of 2 cents probably 99.99% of the population would think of 2 pennies minted in 1 cent denominations

As with everything in life we can easily misperceive what is being discussed, in the case of 2 cents probably 99.99% of the population would think of 2 pennies minted in 1 cent denominations and HIV as being minted as destructive ideas

As with everything in life we can easily misperceive what is being discussed, in the case of 2 cents probably 99.99% of the population would think of 2 pennies minted in 1 cent denominations

As with everything in life we can easily misperceive what is being discussed, in the case of 2 cents probably 99.99% of the population would think of 2 pennies minted in 1 cent denominations and HIV as being minted as destructive ideas

This image and that image depicts a unit of currency issued by the United States of America. It is solely a work of the United States government, is ineligible for US copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States.