Category: science

Even a rocket scientist didn’t know

But the amateur did know, how to find what they had lost for 10 years.

Like with HIV/AIDS which is the most convoluted disease name in history, experts can make claims that something is not there, when it actually is there, and, the other way around.

In this case, it was the amateur who found it. IT/IS a satellite:

As seen in Tech Times:

In a blog post, Scott Tilley describes that while searching High Earth Orbit for signs of the mysterious Zuma satellite, he detected signals from satellite 2000-017A instead, the IMAGE satellite thought to have been long dead.

More data gathering confirmed that the signals were from IMAGE indeed. However, when his original blog post did not get the attention of anyone who could possibly do something with the discovery, he contacted the principal investor of IMAGE, Dr. James L. Burch, last Jan. 24.

Two days later, he got a confirmation from Richard J. Burley, former ground system manager and mission director of IMAGE. Burley said that the engineers at Goddard Spaceflight Center have detected a signal consistent with IMAGE.

HIV/AIDS is supposed to describe a disease where if you have sex with someone infected with the virus you could get sick for the rest of your life, “immune system malfunctioning Major Tom.”

The experts, like NASA, are missing something.

First, let’s look at the stupidity of HIV/AIDS as a label. AIDS is a disease. HIV is a virus. The virus causes the disease.

Flu is a disease. TFV is the virus that causes the disease. They don’t call it TFV/FLU or FV/INFLUENZA because naming it like that would be stupid but that is what they do with immune system deficiency which is claimed to be caused by a virus. They call it HIV/AIDS. THEY are lost, like satellites.

AIDS is the disease and there is no other causes besides HIV is there?*

Let’s ask an amateur to look out there in space for an answer. It’s more likely to be floating around there than in the space between medical science ears.

Better chance an amateur figures it out than experts that have schedules and appointment$.

Or did they know about it but LIE/TO the public since the satellite was first found for sale in the classifieds?

An amateur finds a satellite that NASA can’t find, while they declare it Lost In Space and ask congress for more money for new satellites.

Hmm.

In the case of HIV/AIDS it’s sorta the opposite, they discover it, and then ask for more money to find more of it, what orbits it takes around humans, and how to control it’s path.

One thing in common, request for funds.

HIV/AIDS is found orbiting the imagination. Yes it is indeed there.

It was the amateur that discovered it.

* Actually there are other causes, 29 of them not related to HIV at all since AIDS is a syndrome of diseases. See if you can find anyone that has AIDS that isn’t also HIVI (that extra I is for Infected). So to be consistent, all the other diseases under they massively broad category of illnesses called AIDS should be when diagnosed, added to the front of AIDS with that back-slash. For example, Fungus can cause AIDS so it should be said that when one gets Fungus Disease, that it be called F/AIDS. Or better yet, call it F*AIDS.

Image of satellite orbits by Rrakanishu and used with permission under GNU Free Documentation License

Feature image of a satellite sandwich not suitable for human consumption or by HI viruses is in the public domain and made by NASA’s multi-million dollar fantasy department.

 


What will they think of next

Feature image of the “letter D” By Alma Cebrian (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Image snapshot from Google news October 19, 2017

 


Morphophonemes in science**

An article appearing on United Press International website states that a study at the University of Colorado found “the process protecting the body from autoimmune disease may also prevent it from creating antibodies to HIV-1”.*

UPI.com news snapshot July 12, 2017

OMG I can’t stop laughing. This is the most absurd in their face statement that contradicts everything HIV is built on, coming from researchers, scientists, no, school kids.

The tests for “HIV” only find antibodies, the test for HIV does not find HIV, it finds antibodies.

Thus when someone tests positive, they test positive for antibodies. Mind you in reality it is testing positive for antibodies in general, the tests do not specifically find “HIV” in the sense that most people believe what HIV is, it just finds viruses which every human has in them.

So here we have a school, with basically kindergartners in medical science in class studying something. It’s like when they do science projects and goof.

Let’s look at how they contradict what HIV is built on.

The study claims that our immune systems protect ourselves from autoimmune disease while preventing it from creating antibodies to HIV. If that statement were true – ROFL – oh sorry, I still can’t stop laughing – then no one would test positive for HIV because there would be no antibodies!

Without “HIV antibodies” we don’t test positive. No one would test positive.

The other ridiculously absurd statement they make is that “our immune systems protect ourselves from autoimmune disease”, yet they believe that HIV causes AD – Autoimmune Disease.  The foundation of HIV is that it causes autoimmune disease. If our bodies protect ourselves from it, it doesn’t get it. Get it? The school kids don’t get it, they are immune to this. Most people are immune, they just can’t understand that they have been lied to all this time about viruses.

Their statement is so stupid. It’s like saying the fortress protects from enemies but it doesn’t. One could state that a fortress is designed to protect from enemies and sometimes enemies get in, but they don’t do that with their statements, because with virology, and with fortresses, if someone comes in and starts shooting things up, there’s evidence there was a fight. Antibodies do that, they blow to pieces viruses that the body shouldn’t have there. Then the cleaning crews come in and flush those pieces down the toilet or in the trash. Antibodies are found as evidence that an “infection” or invaders came in. Antibodies are the military. It’s like finding shells, casings, helmets laying around, and dead invaders, finding antibodies is like seeing an invasion happened after it’s over, or maybe some enemy is still hiding in the fort (like they claim HIV hides in the body) but like in real life, that enemy hiding will be found before long and also dealt with.

HIV science is like science fiction, no, science fiction is more congruent! Many stories told about space invaders and rockets to the moon make more sense than HIV science and reading headlines like this about school kids “discovering” something new which is based on absurdities in science (AIS) is laughable.

So again, this 1st grade science project presented by a substitute teacher so to speak is cute, but it’s not valid. Based on the foundations of HIV/SCIENCE if antibodies are present there was an infection. School kids claim though that the body prevents antibodies from ever occurring.

Thus if they were right, there would be NOT ONE SINGLE POSITIVE TEST RESULT.

How does one spell “Flawed Idiotic Study Of Many” – FISOM.

Another thing to note, the use of the term autoimmune disease. HIV is a virus they claim, that they claim causes AIDS which they claim is an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Somewhere in all that definition mess is the concept that they are autoimmune diseases. Let’s look at the word “autoimmune”. It’s a lot like proactive which is another stupid term. Proactive is like saying really active or active active or super active or AGRESSIVE. An immune system tries to make one immune to something. Immunity. Auto immune? Is it on a wall timer? Can we set the times of immunity? Is this like auto pilot? Our immune systems are already on auto pilot, so the term “auto immune” is either stupid, redundant, or clever salesmanship used to describe a boring basic small car as if it’s something quite elaborate with all the bells and whistles.

In other words, autoimmune is the same as immune system working as it does automatically. We could acronymize that as ISWAIDA. That acronym wouldn’t sell though so we have to scratch that. Things that sell, that’s what’s important!

*look at the Wikipedia section shown below that explains the wacko science used here. There are types and subtypes. This section is just on HIV-1. Who knew you could be infected with so much garbage science! Or is it a syndrome that we have here of naming things, like Steve, John, and Mary, all subtypes or protypes of last names. OMGICSROFL.

HIV-1

HIV-1 is the most common and pathogenic strain of the virus. Scientists divide HIV-1 into a major group (Group M) and two or more minor groups, namely Group N, O and possibly a group P. Each group is believed to represent an independent transmission of SIV into humans (but subtypes within a group are not).[2] A total of 39 ORFs are found in all six possible reading frames (RFs) of HIV-1 complete genome sequence,[3] but only a few of them are functional.

Group M

With ‘M’ for “major”, this is by far the most common type of HIV, with more than 90% of HIV/AIDS cases deriving from infection with HIV-1 group M. The M group is subdivided further into clades, called subtypes, that are also given a letter. There are also “circulating recombinant forms” or CRFs derived from recombination between viruses of different subtypes which are each given a number. CRF12_BF, for example, is a recombination between subtypes B and F.

  • Subtype A is common in West Africa.[4]
  • Subtype B is the dominant form in Europe, the Americas, Japan, and Australia.[5]
  • Subtype C is the dominant form in Southern Africa, Eastern Africa, India, Nepal, and parts of China.[5]
  • Subtype D is generally only seen in Eastern and central Africa.[5]
  • Subtype E is found in Southeast Asia which is the dominant form for heterosexuals as transmission rate is much higher than most other subtypes.
  • Subtype F has been found in central Africa, South America and Eastern Europe.[6]
  • Subtype G (and the CRF02_AG) have been found in Africa and central Europe.[6]
  • Subtype H is limited to central Africa.[6]
  • (Subtype I) was originally used to describe a strain that is now accounted for as CRF04_cpx, with the cpx for a “complex” recombination of several subtypes.[citation needed]
  • Subtype J is primarily found in North, Central and West Africa, and the Caribbean[7]
  • Subtype K is limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Cameroon.[6]

These subtypes are sometimes further split into sub-subtypes such as A1 and A2 or F1 and F2.[citation needed] In 2015, the strain CRF19, a recombinant of subtype A, subtype D and subtype G, with a subtype D protease, was found to be strongly associated with rapid progression to AIDS in Cuba.[8] This is not thought to be a complete or final list, and further types are likely to be found.[9]

 
HIV-1 subtype prevalence in 2002

Group N

The ‘N’ stands for “non-M, non-O”. This group was discovered by a Franco-Cameroonia team in 1998, when they identified and isolated the HIV-1 variant strain, YBF380, from a Cameroonian woman who died of AIDS in 1995. When tested, the YBF380 variant reacted with an envelope antigen from SIVcpz rather than with those of Group M or Group O, indicating it was indeed a novel strain of HIV-1.[10] As of 2015, less than 20 Group N infections have been recorded.[11]

Group O

The O (“Outlier”) group is not usually seen outside of West-central Africa. It is reportedly most common in Cameroon, where a 1997 survey found that about 2% of HIV-positive samples were from Group O.[12] The group caused some concern because it could not be detected by early versions of the HIV-1 test kits. More advanced HIV tests have now been developed to detect both Group O and Group N.[13]

Group P

In 2009, a newly analyzed HIV sequence was reported to have greater similarity to a simian immunodeficiency virus recently discovered in wild gorillas (SIVgor) than to SIVs from chimpanzees (SIVcpz). The virus had been isolated from a Cameroonian woman residing in France who was diagnosed with HIV-1 infection in 2004. The scientists reporting this sequence placed it in a proposed Group P “pending the identification of further human cases”.[14][15][16]

**https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoneme#Neutralization_and_archiphonemes

Feature image By Thomas Splettstoesser (www.scistyle.com) – Newly created version of this PD image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HIV-SIV-phylogenetic-tree.svg, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=39403102

Phylogenetic Tree of the SIV and HIV viruses.

  • Viruses Depicted:
  • Human
    HIV-1 M (Main) group, including reference strains from subtypes A-J. Group M is responsible for the pandemic.

    HIV-1 O (Outlier) group, most commonly found in West Africa
    HIV-1 N (Not-M, Not-O) group, found in a very small number of individuals in West Africa
    HIV-1 M group reference strains: A_UG.U455, A_KE.Q2317, B_US.JRFL, B_US.WEAU160, C_ET.ETH2220, C_IN.21068, D_ZR.NDK, D_ZR.ELI, F_FI.FIN6393, F_BE.VI850, G_SE.SE6165, G_BE.DRCBL, H_CF.90CF056, H_BE.VI997, J_SE.SE91733, J_SE.SE92809, and CRF01 AE_CF.90CF402 and AE_TH.CM240, which are subtype A in pol.
    HIV-1 N group: N_CM.YBF30
    HIV-1 O group: O_CM.ANT70, O_CM.MVP5180
    HIV-2 subtypes A and B: H2A_DE.BEN, H2A_SN.ST, H2B_GH.D205, and H2B_CI.EHO
  • Simian
    SIVcpz from chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes (P.t.t.):
    SIVcpz.GAB, SIVcpz.US, and SIVcpz.Cam3
    SIVcpz from chimpanzee Pan troglodytes shweinfuthii (P.t.s.): SIVcpz.ANT
    SIV African Green Monkey (SIVagm):
    Tantalus (TAN): SIVagm.TAN1
    Vervet (VER): SIVagm.VERTYO, SIVagm.VERAGM3, SIVagm.VER9063, SIVagm.VER155
    Grivet (GRI): SIVagm.GRI677
    Sabaeus (SAB): SIVagm.SAB1C
    SIV Sooty Mangaby (SIVsm) (also found in captive macaques): SIVsm.mac251, SIVsm.smm9
    SIV L’hoest: SIV.LHOEST
    SIV Mandrill: SIV.MNDGB1
    SIV Sun: SIV.SUN

Based on work by the Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory.


Psyence

“A key feature of scientific theories is that they make successful predictions, which we can use to determine whether they’re likely to be right.” – Ars Technica, article entitled “Einstein still annoyingly right….”

Right by who? Scientists who cannot even grasp that a virus can be carried by a mosquito, believing the HIV/LIE that it can’t be transmitted by flying dirty shared needles?

We always accept that others who are well educated and have titles are more knowledgeable than we are with their subjects of study, but should we?

In reading this article about Einstein being “annoying” for some weird reason, like “he’s right” I started wondering, how do we know he’s right? Like the mess called HIV/AIDS right is wrong.

So there’s this “distortion of space” that proves his theory of relativity. Hmm. Sounds like HIV science. It’s distorted and thus proves to everyone that it’s real.

The article states “Relativity predicted that the mass of the Sun should distort space enough to bend the light arriving from distant stars.”

The mass of the sun is supposed to do this? How about simple refraction of light. Like duh. Einstein was wrong.

How can Einstein be wrong? LOL, just like how so many things are.

Take this from the article also, “Not only was relativity confirmed yet again, but the result cleared up a potentially awkward possibility, namely that the star was older than the Universe itself.”

OMG this is the most absurd stupid statement, saying that something is older than something that has been around for eternity, but this is the kind of crap that all these hucksters pull on us. They use such eloquent speech that is refracted so what we see is not what really is there.

What is really out there in space is $.

Now for those who have red this far and believe that I’m cracked, lunatiatic, and stupid, and make the conclusion that I don’t know anything about anything, that just goes to show how wrong thay are as all things are relative.

Feature image of Einstein in 1921 By Ferdinand Schmutzer – http://www.bhm.ch/de/news_04a.cfm?bid=4&jahr=2006 [dead link], archived copy (image), Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=34239518