Gay blood ban may soon end, sorta, maybe, probably not


The headline on Time magazine online edition read “The ban on gay men donating blood might be going away”[1]. Notice they don’t say LGBT. Does this mean that HIV/THREATS are only affecting men? It doesn’t affect T’s or L’s or B’s? It’s only a G problem?

When we read the fine print the headline doesn’t exactly match what FDA is proposing.

FDA is seeking input from those interested in adding their 2 cents to consider what they think is a good next step.

you can read the details here

Here is a part of the summary

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Adminis


They seek opinion based on recent scientific data and considering changing from a “risk behavior” model to individual assessment of risk behavior.

That’s like piling dog shit on a pile of trash and saying “This is a better pile of garbage”.

It’s like only taking data that’s recent regarding a current train wreck in order to prevent other train wrecks when new data ignores the old data and the old data contains the truth about how the companies that make the rails skimped on the quality of steel they used in thousands of miles of track laid down already, and misinterpreted some x-ray photographs of the molecular structure of the steel, whereas no politician or official anywhere wants to tell the public that there was a made a mistake, and that all government agencies that were supposed to be protecting the public screwed up, and that many or all train wrecks in the last 32 years were caused by bad track as the uproar would be worse than the noise inside a vortex tornado during a fake massacre featuring fireworks at the Bataclan Theatre where heavy metal band who’s name I already forgot was playing and acting.

All HIV research is based on a faulty theory (one that ignores that dirty flying mosquito needles can transmit any virus) and faulty so called evidence which is little more than interpretations of slices and dices of viral particles also known as cellular debris which are subject to a wild array of interpretations, none of which can definitively be deemed absolute causation.

Until these authoritease can admit that there is a flaw in the very track laid down for the HIV train to ride, all rides are subject to catastrophic failures.

But as government and mindsets and HIV/COMMERCE goes, don’t expect to see any dumping of the trash, or re-evaluating the quality of the track anytime soon. Still, at least we have gotten this far where they see that there is a serious flaw in discriminating against blood when blood doesn’t even have a gender and there is since 1984 supposedly a “test that finds immune deficiency viruses” when in fact they don’t find any such thing unless you want to believe that testing for catastrophic failures finds infected tracks.

[1] – Time article

[2] – “Dance to the Berdache” – feature image Sac and Fox Nation ceremonial dance to celebrate the two-spirit person. George Catlin (1796–1872); Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. Image is in the public domain. Native Indians didn’t have issues regarding blood or marriage like governments do. Governments have often set out to purposefully spill Native Indians and other “enemies” blood. Has anyone thought of banning blood spills? How can government justify blood spills when it has no way of knowing which soldiers have had sex with other men? Is war blood spilling safe? Shouldn’t government practice safe war, making all soldiers wear body condoms so that blood is never spilled in order to prevent the spread of ISV (Immune System Viruses) especially on a windy day where atomized particles of male blood that had sex with other male blood are swept up into the air and spread all over the world? Someday those who follow their leaders and those who lead who have banned blood that is homosexual will see how stupid all this HIV nonsense is which contradicts itself left and right. For now, invest in blinders.

Why would any Gay, Fag, Queer, or LBT vote for Hillary when she voted against same sex marriage twice

Hillary Clinton opposed same-sex marriage until 2013.[1]

Donald Trump has not ever voted on gay marriage. Trump deserves a chance at leading the country a thousand times more than Hillary does.

In the video below we hear and see her state “I believe marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman”. This was in 2004, not exactly the 1950’s, or 1800’s, she said this in the new Millenium.

She also said she believes in the sanctity of straight marriage just like the crap we heard from fundamentalist Christian ass holes. Most of us believe in the sanctity of equality in marriage.

What Hillary did as a liberal to the LGBT community is absolutely unforgivable.

How many gays and LBT’s have suffered for so many years because of her votes and what her vote stated to the country? Millions. NO ONE who has ever voted against gay marriage deserves a chance at running the country. I don’t understand how any LGBT person can ever forgive that of a Democrat.

She didn’t give a crap about the minority LGBT community, all she cared about was the majority of votes she would have lost for her next election. She’s proven herself to be what we are all tired of, politicians. I recommend voting for the other candidate, one who calls her out on her lies and deceit.


[1] – The Atlantic


HB2* is the “gender neutrality bathroom bill” in North Carolina that forces people to use the bathroom corresponding to their gender. The National Basketball Association (NBA) has decided they don’t want to play their game there so they pulled out before coming in that State.

Also note the title of this blurg – it’s worded out as follows – House Bill 2 causes National Basketball Association [to get] out.

*the acronym is expressed as “House Bill 2” (the House of the State of North Carolina)

read official statement from NBA here

A fictional story about Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz pretty much embarrassed himself by not endorsing Trump at the National Republican Convention. He got booed. It’s kinda silly to not endorse the people’s pick, but Ted claims he’s still not happy with how Trump insulted him and his family.

The following presents how after hearing this, I imagine Ted, Trump, and Hillary playing in the schoolyard as tots:

Like the grade schoolyard boy that cries and says that he won’t play with his friend anymore who just called him a name, Ted won’t play with Trump in the sand box anymore.

The only other kid there is Hillary who he never liked.

So what’s Ted going to do when the bully comes back and kicks sand in all their faces, and wrecks the sandbox like he aways does when his friend Trump isn’t around when Hillary runs and hides and emails her friends from her daddy’s private server, and Trump stands there and says “Ted, let’s teach this guy a lesson he will never forget”.

The bully is ready to wreck both their faces and Ted is more concerned about making Trump know how he is still mad at him and Ted keeps whining then gets slammed down by the bully. Ted has a bloody nose and broken middle finger while Trump immediately hits the bully who then runs.

Ted gets up and says to Trump, “As I was saying…… insulted me and my wife and family………”


*Please note this wholly uniquely creative free expression which shall not be plagiarized was categorized under the 3 P’s – Politics, Pride, and Priorities.

Renew the fight

While most of the world is tired of all the fighting, and realizing that most war strategies are failures and/or way too destructive, those who wage war on viruses want the wars to never end. There are those in this war business that do make a pretty penny off it you know…..

So here we have a Yahoo! News headline dated 7/21/2o16 (click on image to read story) that says Prince Harry says world must revive urgency in the A fight (A stands for AIDS).


Inaction?? I just saw little smart cars, brand new, with logos on them in orange and white that say “Ge+ Tested” displayed in authoritative glory in front of the Palm Springs Desert Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Project. Those annoying buggers run around town and infect gay neighborhoods, street festivals, and gay bar parking lots (not straight bars or hotel bars where straights go to pick up sexual partners, noooooooooooo we wouldn’t have them go there because these people wouldn’t stand for it).

So at taxpayers expense we see that the fight is expanding, the disgusting homo blood ban wall still there not allowing us entry into the country of blood donations remains intact unlike our cock foreskin that Jewish doctors gleefully removed from our unsacred bodies making them sacred again, and that discrimination continues to hold it’s head up high because of this disgusting war.

I doubt Prince Harry has done any real research on this topic like I have and others have who don’t listen to contradictory mainstream theories that really make no sense at all. I don’t think he understands or ever heard how the images of “the virus” are thin slices and are so riddled with interpretation possibilities which the true experts in understanding how to understand such electron microscope imagery say that it’s quite the stretch to claim that what is seen in these thin slices is a threatening virus. These TRUE/EXPERTS say it’s nothing more than cellular debris (cellular shit) being pooped out of the cell.

Alas, he’s just doing what all politicians, salesmen, and famous figures do, and what all warmongers do, constantly call us to arms, entertain and sell us stuff that we don’t need or sell us stuff that we feel can’t live without, and keep the war machines running.

Oh wait, I am wrong, movie stars usually say END/THE/WARS. My bad. But wait, they keep calling to arms with the AIDS/WAR. My good.

Dear dear Harry, (and other celebrities who we can totally trust will never mislead us with other people’s money and bad information) please come to Palm Springs and let me show you how the war has bombarded this area, the casualties, and what can be done to STOP/THE/WAR. I will gladly pick you up and give you a tour showing you all the destruction so you can go back and start telling everyone to END/THE/WAR/ON/AIDS instead of expand it.

A for AIDS

ACT UP – AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power, that group, formed in a long long time ago, in a distant galaxy far far away called the 1980’s, oddly used just the A to describe Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. This was considered perfectly acceptable by them, by the gay community (there was no ABCDLGBT/COMMUNITY back then). So they called them selves A-C-T-U-P. That’s fine, groups can call themselves whatever they want and it induced a concept when conveying the term that they were radicals doing something good like when children act up and need to be punished for demanding more candy which if the parent caves and gives in to them and the kid gets more candy their teeth rot and they have immune deficiency problems.

So let’s change the tired HIV/AIDS term and update it with fresh concepts like was done by adding LGBT to the gay community. We take the A like the “Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Coalition To Unleash Power” did and make it simply describe the whole acronym AIDS and the whole disease name Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome because clearly anyone can see the need for saving on letters, and cutting down on carbon dioxide emissions.

So it’s now HIV/A. But that’s hard to say too. Let’s make it HIVA. Or, since the H for Human is stupid to use at all because like duh it’s in humans and we never see cases of MIV coming from mosquitoes, so it’s better said as IVA.

That sounds stupid too, so why even bother with the IV because everyone knows that IV causes A, lets just say A.

A for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Used in a sentence, “Get tested for A”.

Ahhh, that’s so much easier to say, eh?


This acronym or combination of acronyms could be used in two different ways.

  1. To promote giving AID to HI Virus study and such
  2. To present and AID in a different understanding of what is going on

AIDS is commonly known as Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Why a syndrome? Well that has to do with the fact that it’s not one disease, it’s a category, of diseases, different ones…..a syndrome. But this added descriptor is unnecessary as what comes before it, Immune Deficiency, is also not one disease.

In all reality simply stating Immune Deficiency is sufficient to describe the problem, unless you want to make it clear that there are other diseases associated with it, in which case you can simply call it Immune Deficiency or the other diseases which all have multiple causes.

The term Immune Deficiency is also rather broad. It’s like defining the entire US landscape by saying it’s full of buildings. Try presenting that to an architect when you want him to build a city or suburban housing project as a definition of what you want done. Used in a sentence, “Dear architect, please create a set of new buildings for me. Thank you.” This is basically how Immune Deficiency is described even when adding “acquired” and “syndrome”.

Acquired is a rather redundant term also. The overwhelming belief in disease is that they are acquired, not created, yet it’s really more evident that disease is created, not acquired, as if it was acquired, all people would get them when they are exposed to their supposed causes. It’s unnecessary to say they are acquired.

So really we should just call it HIV/ID.

But looking at HIV the H is redundant, unnecessary, it’s affecting humans, like duh.

So really we should just call it IV/ID.

But this brings up a perplexing inconsistency (as if the medical community isn’t full of them). The I in IV is “immunodeficiency” but the I in ID is “immune”.

To be clear, concise, and accurate they should be the same, so it should be either IDV/ID or IV/I.

Used in a sentence, “The gay dude drove past the Palm Springs Desert AIDS Project and saw a sign for testing so that he would be protected from getting IV/I (the Immunodeficiency Virus that causes Immunodeficiency duh) but he wondered why testing only finds antibodies and not actual virus because he knows that antibodies are merely a response to some type of infection and they stay around for years after they are created even after the threat has long passed and this is the concept of vaccination so why on earth would anyone get tested for IV especially when they keep targeting men who have sex with men as if mosquitoes don’t have sex with men, women, and children, thus passing on the virus like all mosquitoes do with all viruses, which when you understand this realize that all we have been told about sex and catching killer diseases that way resemble fundamentalist Christian cult indoctrination more than reality.”

Then again, why even refer to a disease as “this causes that”, we don’t do that for flu. We don’t say “You have FV/IS (Flu Virus which causes Influenza Syndrome) we just say you have influenza, or because we are lazy, chop that into merely “flu”. So with HIV/AIDS or better stated as IV/I, we can go one step further and simply state that someone has Immunodeficiency or I.

Used in a sentence, “I found out I got infected by having sex with a mosquito I saw come from the neighbor’s yard after it sucked the blood out of that positive dude and now I am positive I have I.”

The really scary thing about studying the acronymization of things, is that we kinda figure out that I is nothing new at all yet sex is supposed to be the new and improved as seen on TV path to getting there as if air travel isn’t and people are being led into bombarding their immune system (where 70% of it lives in your gut) with chemical warfare thinking that it’s not like dropping bombs in a forest to kill an infestation of rabbits while expecting the forest to still look pretty and support wildlife afterwards.

The immune system is teeming with wildlife we call good bacteria. Dropping chemicals onto it is like spraying DDT on the forest.


Anti-social Behavior is said to be caused by immune system problems.




Charlie Sheen wants to do a reality show about his I* virus status.

I hope he gets wind of this site and reads up on other sites that present the best reality show seen anywhere of how mixed up the whole HIV/AIDS thing is and what REALITY is going on. I’d love to sit down and talk with him about it all.

* I virus is the “Immunodeficiency” virus. There is no need for the H as it’s rediculously redundant. The H is for “human” and it’s of course being tested in humans. Has there ever been a case of MIV in humans (Monkey Immunodeficiency Virus) or AIV (Amphibian Immunodeficiency Virus)? We don’t go around saying we have HIV when we get the flu (Human Influenza Virus) so we shouldn’t say that when we have I (Immunodeficiency).