IMGAY.community |
|
|
END THE WAR on aids ask your new president elect when he's going to end this war The AIDS war started in the early 1980's. The general CONSENSUS states that HIV is sexually transmitted, causes AIDS, something to fear, and something to FIGHT. The war has been going on for too long. It's time for it to STOP. We are told "HIV causes AIDS" and is absolute fact, and we are told that anyone who disbelieves this is in the minority. Those "in the minority" are even called conspiracy theorists by some, or denialists, or worse. Some have even called for it to be "illegal" for anyone to question the theories of HIV/AIDS, claiming it is "absolute". Those "few scientists" and individuals who have studied this issue, who say one virus cannot possibly cause multiple conditions, are often shunned. The CONSENSUS is that HIV causes AIDS, and all foundations of treatment are based on this supposed fact. Declarations of war and fact are often proven wrong "Consensus science is no replacement for absolutes." At one time there was also a CONSENSUS regarding our furthest "planet" for 72 years, until one day, the few scientists who kept on saying that it wasn't a planet were heard. In 2006, the CONSENSUS changed, and Pluto is now officially NOT A PLANET. This was after 72 years of it being stated "as fact" that Pluto was a planet, a planet that was extremely difficult to see (just like viruses). CONSENSUS can change. The "fact" about Pluto was written in millions of textbooks, and in media, seminars, speeches, and in everyone's mind for many many years until it was finally proven that it just couldn't be called a planet any longer. With the HIV/AIDS theory, there are so many contradictions, so many "false positives", so many broken promises for a vaccine, and so many casualties, who wouldn't want the war to end. As with any war, the issue demands constant scrutiny and re-evaluation. Any "official" who shuns such alternate theories on HIV/AIDS, claiming that re-evaluation is "not necessary", should be scrutinized. All matters of war need constant re-evaluation at least until they actually END. HIV/REAL Today we have those who insist HIV is real, after all THE CONSENSUS IS THERE, it has been peer reviewed, effects have been noticed. NOT EVERYONE AGREES. Thus, in reality THERE IS NO CONSENSUS! Those who insist something is amiss with the theory that an invisible virus could cause so much destruction are in the minority. They say the virus has never been isolated, and the drugs often cause death and worsens the conditions. Even healthy people are put on these drugs? Some even warn to stay away from these people who would discuss the flaws of the HIV theories. Indepencence There are those who have studied, dispensed, and promoted the facts, yet when we scrutinize carefully what is being stated "officially", we find that those in CONSENSUS regarding HIV/AIDS are missing some very important facts. Consensus was THE driving force in breaking free from Britain, and the forging of the United States Constitution. It was revolting against consensus that founded the USA. Our forefathers' consensus drove us to independence, something that is often celebrated in America. It was logical for the US to become independent in it's thinking and policy making, thus, those who founded America were at that time, in the minority, cast off, shunned. Vulgar epithets are often tossed by those who promote HIV/AIDS research at anyone who dare question the theory. These same people often are against defamation, shouting for equality, and more. How ironic. The Consensus Hex There were other consensus that drove change. One very popular account was amongst the Puritans in Salem, the consensus was to burn Witches. The similarities are amazing when we compare the burning of Witches in Salem to those who condemn people who remove themselves from the majority consensus regarding viral beliefs, especially regarding one called HIV that supposedly has the ability to HEX. The consensus amongst the majority of scientists and others that "HIV" is real is only that, consensus, it is "majority opinion". It is not based on logic, it is based on political principles, fears, and other things that make people get stuck in beliefs. HIV has never been unequivocally found in the laboratory, and it has never been "grown" in a lab dish, this is extremely well documented, yet there is a longstanding belief is that it's there as consensus science claims it sees evidence of it. This is similar to the beliefs that the Puritans had of Witches, they saw evidence of their witchcraft, thus the consensus was that it was real. It was the consensus of a small group of medical politicians with an added pinch of GAY/ACTIVISM that led us into the war on AIDS It started with a few sick people. Media got hold of a new idea, that a new gay disease was discovered. Then fear took hold, and it snowballed. Healthy people were coerced into consuming TOXIC/MEDS and to go off to war. In this war on AIDS we see healthy people fighting with themselves. We see those who are vociferously against war, turn around and promote war on viruses. This is hypocritical. War has casualties in and outside of the human body. It makes no sense to go to war with something inside yourself when ill. It's better to let the body heal and move out the less desired "invader" using peaceful methods. Those who want to "treat" the disease are using bombs to destroy internal cell villages they claim are housing the invisible invader. One big problem with this methodology is that the innocent cells also get killed with these chemical weapons. AIDS drugs are weapons and AIDS drugs are chemicals. HIV/INVISIBLE Hunting invisible microbes with machine guns, that's basically what we are doing with AIDS/DRUGS. Invisible even to the common microscope these "invaders" can never be found "oh but they are there" they say. Sound familiar? The leaders of this war on AIDS are constantly trying to draft me and you. They want us to believe that their tests are accurate and claim we must get tested. I tell them fuck off. I had my own experiences with the medical profession, and long enough to see the greed and flaws in so many of their theories, especially when it comes to war with things that are invisible. The body often heals itself. When it does, they take the credit or give it to their medication. When the body doesn't heal, they blame the virus, regardless if it can actually be proven to exist. When someone dies, they NEVER blame their concoctions or their treatments, NEVER. Yet in court, they have been shown to be wrong quite often. One particularly disturbing example is where FALSE POSITIVES for "HIV" come up. more on false positives.... Stop Bombing Innocent Cells The AIDS war advocates say "drugs target" go ahead, blast away, they are doing their job there in the field. In reality they are a shot in the dark bloodstream. They are killers. They shoot everywhere. They enter the blood like chemicals enter a stream bed, dispersed throughout fluid motion. Most people don't bathe in a polluted stream. Doing so might kill you or someone you love. Yet few think of how cells feel when they have to swim upstream trying to escape poisons that enter them called AIDS/DRUGS. Think of yourself as one of those healthy cells, jumping into your drug polluted blood stream, absorbing it all. If that thought makes you ill then..... If you tested "positive" consider getting a good lawyer, start looking into the details and flaws of testing, and consider that one person was recently awarded.... $2.5 Million Award Over False HIV Positive Viruses are not living things Even one of the most prominent AIDS organizations points this fact out, well, at least the "not living" part. Here is a quote from the AIDSmeds.com website on 4/10/2008: "In order for viruses to reproduce, they must infect a cell. Viruses are not technically alive: They are sort of like a brain with no body. In order to make new viruses, they must hi-jack a cell, and use it to make new viruses." Hi-jack? How can a brain without a body hi-jack anything. I would like one scientist to point to anything in the entire universe that can pop it's brain onto something and start telling it what to do. It is scientific MUMBO/JUMBO, and the bottom line of all viral research is try to lead people into taking their expensive medications and treatments. There is big money in taking chemicals and turning them into profit. I'm sorry, but I do not trust anyone who says that there are brains walking the earth attaching themselves to things and taking over......that's science fiction literature or b-movie material. Yet this is what we are being told, basically. All viruses are transmitted via the air Sexual transmission ONLY is absolutely ridiculous. There are no special properties of any virus that make them impervious to being kicked up by the wind, and thus all viruses are transmitted by air. If you doubt this think about it for a moment, what specific property makes the HI virus ONLY attaching itself to the extremely broad term "body fluids"? There isn't. There is absolutely NO scientific evidence of this widely beileved claim. EVERY viral particle there is can be tossed in the wind. Claims that a certain virus is only sexually transmitted simply does not hold up to scrutiny. Where does that take us? To realizing that viruses are not the cause, as if they were, everyone would be infected by simply breathing or being exposed to air. The whole viral causation theory has been disproved long ago by the most brilliant scientists of the world. It is very unfortunate that many people have been tricked into believing that viruses are smarter than a news reporter. Gallileo, Einstein, Alexander Graham Bell, and other great minds were also plagued with this problem of getting through to people what they knew. So too today, it may take a while before everyone "gets it". It was decades before the public realized that "trans fats" were not good, now we hear it all the time. How we get infected with information If you believe infection with certain viruses are only carried out by sexual transmissions, ask those who claim this to provide you definitive evidence as to what are the exact properties of a viral particle of matter that is lighter than air that would make it impervious to being tossed in the wind like dust, sand, dirt, and every other element listed in the periodic table. The reality is that viruses are all carried by the wind. Some "authorities" say the virus "dies when it is exposed to air" but when we examine thoroughly the properties of viruses and the "life" they have, we find out that they are not living at all. The do not eat, breathe, or have babies. They "replicate" by breaking down into SMALLER PIECES! They are mere particles of matter. When we press these scientists that are all caught up in the cyclone of HIV/AIDS definitions, they continue to stumble on their responses, that is, if you even get one. many of them have holier than thou attitudes. If you do get a response, it's often a very non-specific statement like "it just isn't. This is one of many clues that the claim that certain viruses are "only transmitted sexually" is an actually an infection of certain scientific mindsets and their presentations to the public via popular press. All viruses can be carried by the wind. Thus, the theory of infection by sex is garbage as if there was such a viral threat to mankind, it would have infected the whole population. HIV/AIDS - proven to be a bad hypothesis long ago. So why is it here. Demands. Politics. Pressure. Fear. Hysteria. Demands & more demands brought the concept into "reality". When it is disscected, the theory consistently remains as dead as a lab frog.
The Western Ink Blot Scientists learned long ago that The Western Blot could not provide any kind of accuracy. This test has been a cornerstone of "HIV testing". What's amazing is that just the other day I overheard a representative from the Desert AIDS project who was promoting testing, say that "even when you get your results, there is no certainty as to your status". Imagine that! Why bother? It's like taking in your car in for a smog test, and the mechanic says he can't guarantee the test will give you any form of accurate results. Look at the above series of 19 different indicators that actually show various proteins, antibodies, and a mismash of material found in the blood. They used only one blood sample which was separated into 19 different vials and then sent to 19 labs. It was a controlled experiment. It's published in the JAMA. There were 19 different results! Why haven't the people profiting from this shouted this from the rooftops of their McMansions? They proved testing was horribly flawed way back in 1988. It's still seriously flawed today. It's not even approved for diagnosing anything specific, yet there are HIV televangelists and fundraisers everywhere saying to get tested.. This is not conspiracy theory crap, these are the facts, testing is what needs to be tested, no, testing already WAS TESTED, and it FAILED MISERABLY. When testing indicates broad inconsistencies within the same test, we have a problem. That's why in HIV/AIDS they ask you all sorts of questions about your behavior, they couldn't figure out status only with testing. Now they claim to have rapid this or that testing but they are all shots in the dark, are not meant to be diagnostics (read the warning labels) yet they are constantly sold to the unsuspecting public by AIDS/HIV activists as necessary. They are crap. The western ink blot test was proven to be flawed back in 1988. One blood sample sent to 19 different labs returned 19 different results. There was no positive or negative anywhere. Another problem with "testing for HIV" as they call it, when in reality it's testing for antibodies, is there isn't even any worldwide standards. Imagine accessing this data you are reading now with no standards of how a computer should process electricity, bits, bytes, and display it on your screen. It would be a big mess or nothing at all. That's what we have with testing. The only proven thing with testing for 'HIV' is that random antibodies are found, which are found in everyone and are non-toxic and not in the least bit life threatening. Different labs and different organizations have different protocols. None agree on how to find "the virus". Every country is different. In the USA there are over 3 different ways to "find" the virus depending on which organization is doing the testing. The consistent thing is the tests provide INK BLOTS. Take a look at the 19 results below, is the blood positive or negative for antibodies? NO STANDARDS If you think that standards are not important, try building a home with tools that have varying standards of measurement and see how well it stands. Use a power drill that works on 12 volts and plug it in the 110 volt outlet, er, NO DON'T! Use nails that are not standardized in their strength or measure, er, NO DON'T! Your house would fail inspection and come crashing down with the first huff and puff. This is pretty much what we have when we look at the lack of standards in the HIV/AIDS community. We have a house that over activism built with all sorts of wacky ideas of what was supposed to hold the HIV/STUDS together.
STOP / TESTING
LIES CONTINUE TO INFECT EDUCATION EFFORTS IT'S HIV SCIENCE/FICTION END WASTEFUL SPENDING ON BROAD CATEGORY RESEARCH SPERM IS NON/TOXIC VIRUSES ARE DEAD MATTER CONDOM/HOLES ARE BIGGER THAN VIRUSES
Why do the worlds top HIV/AIDS scientists have trouble agreeing on what ink blots mean exactly? Here is the sorry truth, ink blots leave those who read them to imagine what they see in them. Slick disease pitches are then sold to those who got caught you in a time of media terror and passes on to generations. It's the oldest trick in the book, sell them something to calm their fear of what is imagined to be real. They are just ink blots! It's time to stop the insanity. It's
time to set the I don't make this stuff up, they do. I'm just the messenger. Don't shoot anyone unless it's using your sperm which is non-toxic. When you realize the truth just let it go and move on, heal, forgive, and be strong inside and never let this kind of mistake happen in your world ever again. Maybe I'm dreaming but I will never be gay until I see the end of the most fucked up thing ever to visit my gay neighborhood. I've asked it to leave, politely, but it just keeps hanging around. I've tried doing makeovers. I've tried making this website gay. It's not working. Period. I gladly HAAD been out for over 20 years and just couldn't stand it anymore. I went back in. The plague of errrrs brought on by the drug pushers in my gay community is just too hard to deal with and the persecution I face every day for being NOT TESTED is just too much. I say I don't get tested and they freak out. They won't even hardly date me. They spread viscious rumors, defaming me. They won't have sex with me cuz they say "He must be positive". Where the fuck am I? I try to tell them AIDS is not a disease it's a syndrome and they all keep claiming I will catch it. I tell them I don't play baseball with diseases and they don't listen. First, a disease cannot be caught, a disease is a complex condition, not something that gets tossed. Next, a syndrome is multiple conditions, not one disease, it cannot be thrown like a hockey puck either. Next, complex syndromes cannot be caused by only one thing, they are caused by multiple things. Next, the very diseases listed under AIDS are multiple, not one, they are not all caused by one thing. Error #1.38d. Look it up. Error #2, they have been leading people down Jim Jones cult like path of salvation through experimental poisons called AIDS drugs. They are poisons. They are not health food. Every friend of mine that went this route ended up dead. Thanks doc, thanks to you and all those who have promoted this holocause of a disease/cause theory. I couldn't get through to a single one of them, the fear of not taking medicine was too strong. Today, as I pass by all of my friends gravesites, every fucking where I go in the so called gay community I hear gay dudes yell out to me, "Hey you're cute, I'm positive" or "Hey stud, I'm negative" or "SAFE SEX ONLYYYYYYYY" and "get tested" etc. ad nauseum. I'm over it. I'm over being polite and ignoring this offensive behavior in my face. It makes me sick, not gay. They sound like my old fundamentalist Christian Jesus freako friends of long ago, saying I must get saved by taking the test. Ok, fine, one last chance....all of you proclaiming your status, SHOW ME your test results, don't tell me, show me, where are they? Have you seen them? How come they haven't shown you the results. Here's 19 of them, ONE BLOOD SAMPLE FROM ONE PERSON SENT TO 19 DIFFERENT LABS. Where is this dude's positive or negative? You say there is one? Where? It's nothing but INK BLOTS. INK BLOTS! There is no positive. There is no negative. There's only INK BLOTS! You need an interpreter? Why? I thought you understood ink blots. It's the native language of the testing community. Test my sperm you idiots People prance around saying I should donate to help end AIDS. I donate here. I'm ending AIDS. I have been ending AIDS since the Orwellian year of 1984. I ended it from the beginning when they tested me, and lied to me, saying they were testing for HIV when the reality is they have no absolute way of finding it. There is no HIV test. There are only antibody tests. They only find an array of antibodies, the defenders, the uncorrupted police of your cells. Getting tested for antibodies is like getting the water that goes through your house in pipes tested for oxygen. It's there, so what? Bacteria needs oxygen so your pipes are infected? Antibodies are supposed to be there. They are always there. Someone's not paying attention. End AIDS? End HIV? It's easy to end it, drop the bad definitions, use good ones that make sense, look at the disease conditions that are accurately defined, and paleeeeezzzzze, stop waving your ink blot "get tested" banners in my face. There is nothing wrong with my sperm or my blood you bloody fools and I hate banner ads. I'M NOT GAY ANYMORE When I see an end to HIV/INSANITY maybe then I will be gay, as this mess is strewn all over my once pristine gay community. Oh how I wish the developers of HIV/AIDS would not do this in my back yard. Unfortunately, even when this thing ends, the cemetery plots will still be in plain sight. How am I supposed to forget what they did to my friends, how they bulldozed their way into their minds, killing their sanity, coercing them into ingesting deadly DRUG/POISON. The holocaust killed off so many of my friends healthy blood cells which they so desperately needed for protection when war was declared. They were left with very little. What's even more stranger than truth is that people get all upset about terrorism in far away lands like Darfur (which is a complex problem of immigration by nomads who are looking for food after they experience no rain in their northern regions, and the struggles to live, claim territories, and such) yet people don't get upset about the terrorism that goes on every day to innocent blood cell villages in the human body? HIV drugs are bombing healthy communities of peaceful blood cells.
$2.5 Million Award Over False HIV Positive proves in court that you might be actually HIV Negative Get That Horrible Taste Out Of My Blood Get Your Daily Intake of Yummy Protein Here
do not enter here without an invitation
Threats, demoralization, and intimidation tactics are often used by those who promote viral cause theories. Let's look at what those groups who keep telling us to "get tested" for viruses even they cannot truly find, keep doing which keep making us end up in a rut. They are constantly demoralizing our sexual behaviors, intimidating us into taking unnecessary and inaccurate and non-standardized tests, and are intimidating people who are evaluated as "positive" into taking experimental drugs/poisons, and they consistently threaten that we will die if we don't do what they say, and they all too often attempt to subjugate us. subjugate vt. 1) to bring under control or subjection; conquer. 2) To cause to become subservient, subdue. terrorise v. 1) use of force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate, esp. such use as a political weapon or policy. 2) The demoralization and intimidation produced in this way.
"Some of us are getting sick, not from HIV, but rather from the unrelenting terror & risky treatments being provided to us, and to our dead friends. People are getting rich off this war. I really don't want to lose another friend to the war on HIV terror."
END/WAR |
