No you are not.
You can't be positive. No one is, there are too many errors in testing.
Even a whopping 19 blood samples don't match, nor present any absolute reading!
People claim they are positive, but in reality, when you understand the many errors that permeate what they claim to be "HIV testing" that merely finds natural antibodies, you faint when you realize that when someone says they claim they are HIV positive, they are merely regurgitating poor guesses by those who claim THEY are the authority on viruses. Ever had "the flu"? That can make your test come out positive. There are at least 60 known factors that can easily make an "HIV test" come out "positive". We didn't make this list up, this came from those who claim to know everything about HIV. With such disparities in testing, there isn't anyone that can accurately claim they are absolutely positive they are positive, or positive they are negative, although some are positive they have been misled, although that could be disputed also.
HIV/POSITIVE/STATUS
It May Have Been Due To The Flu
Oh my God! What am I reading? If I am going to test getted for something, I'd make it a test of knowledge about testing and the in accuracies that occur on a daily basis in various attempts my the medical community for diagnosing "infections" with viruses. In the case of highly regarded "HIV testing" all they do is find antibodies. Our research indicates that getting tested for something everyone has, these natural powerful defenders, is like getting tested to see if there is water in your body, or a military base in a country. We should get tested? Why?
Don't
Get Mad At Me
I am only the messenger. Hey you're cute when you are mad, lets
buck, but first have you HIV present ID.
HIV/ID
The virus still has not presented proof of citizenship.
19 Different Results, Same Bood Sample!
Test Getted?
What exactly are you going to do if you test the wrong way, kount on science to save you? They still haven't figured out if it's starve a cold, feed a fever, or if it's feed a cold, starve a fever, and yet how much is the total research tab for this scientific question come to now? You would have thought they would be able to figure this one out. **
The War on AIDS
Some wage viral wars. Others promote peace. What sounds like the better way to heal? Some people even have declared wars on disease, and then cliam they are against war. The term for this is hypocrite. Some doctors have even taken the hypocritical oath.
I'M GAY
As a gay male myself, this situation called "HIV" has concerned me since the begining, around 1984 where the terror being reported about it was Orwellian. I watched people drop like flies when they were given massive doses of HIV drugs to "kill the virus" during the WAR ON AIDS. War? Why war? Who wages war when they are sick? Then I started noticing some inconsistencies in what was stated as "fact" and what also was stated as "fact". There were a lot of contradictions. There still are.
Now Claasss
Then in nutrition class I learned about antibodies. Then a couple years later I got tested. They said the test only found antibodies. I wondered, "Why are they testing for those, my body has those every day of my life and they are good little defenders to have."
Positive for Antibodies?
To this day, the only thing they ever really find in the blood are these mighty little defenders called antibodies. These are the natural defense to your blood space "invaders". If you test negative for antibodies in your blood, get real scared, that's like testing negative for having oxygen in your blood, if you don't have it you don't live very long. Either that, or get scared about testing in general.
Where is it really?
Due to the infinitely small size of any virus, they cannot actually find it by itself, they look for other things that might indicate it's there. They klaim by finding antibodies, they can indicate "infection", but these are not absolute methods by any stretch of the scientific imagination.
Medical Klaims
We live in a free world, with free speech, and freedoms to make claims that are difficult to prove otherwise, but one thing is easy to prove, the contradictions in HIV/SCIENCE are of multiple strains. World scientific organizations differ in their beliefs on "how to find HIV".
URNUTZ
How does anyone completely undoubtedly PROVE that something that is impossible to see, exists and does what is theorized? What it comes to many times is a "scientific vote", as has been seen in the case of Pluto, a planet that changed form in the collective minds of the voting body of scientists who determine "fact" simply by a vote.
MEDIKAL/SCIENCE
I'm still looking for my medicals, I haven't found them and every time I ask the doctor where my medicals are HE/SHE looks at me strange. Then I look at HIM/HER strange. I don't have this problem with my dentist who points to my dentals, and my optometrist doesn't do this when I ask where my opticals are, he simply points to my eyes. Where are my medicals? Then I look at my friends AZT poison by prescription, and realize that's what medicals are.
It's There, Trust Us
HIV may be there or it may not, whatever the case, when it comes to believing something that is claimed to be as powerful a destructive force that HIV is claimed to be BY/SOME, one would be best served to STUDY/HARD to find out if such beliefs are uniformly held to high standards of scientific scruitiny. It's kinda like they are like a dog owner who keeps seeing the dog scratch, thus he "must have fleas" and then they tell you that you MUST start using a toxic way to get rid of them. When you look for them you can't find a single one, yet "they must be there" says the scientist studying the dog, he "sees" evidence pointing to fleas and keeps insisting he's right, even when other scientists say he's mistaken.
It's There I Say
When I look at most research regarding viruses which are about 125,735,210,454,111 times smaller than a flea, something bugs me about their klaims that "they have found it" and "it does this and that." How does one "see" something that far away? They klaimed they saw Pluto and that it was a "planet", then 72 years later, they voted it out of orbit. Science is often a cast of votes, not absolute undisputable proof, especially in the complex world of the multi-faceted functions of the human body, and the infinite smallness of particles of matter that are non-living called viruses.
Death Rate Drops Like Flies
Konsider this, in the 1970's the doctors in Los Angeles went on strike and during that time the death rate dropped like a rock. What does that tell us? To get that answer, see your doctor who will most likely be found on the golf course, on vacation, or busy with other patients who have lost their patience with doctors and scientific klaims.
You Kan't Katch Diseases Like A Baseball
Disease is very complex. Disease is not a game of catch where you catch one and can't drop the ball. Disease is created, over time, not caught. People who are healthy are being told they are going to die cuz they tested positive on an erroneous "test for AIDS", then get pumped up with AIDS drugs, when they are healthy, in order to "keep the virus at bay" as if the drugs are going to send the virus to the dock so it can go in a sailboat around the world. These concepts are all coming from the same medical community that routinely hacks off a part of a new born man's cock to keep them healthy. Excuse me but it seems more logical that god created man in his image, and would like his son's private parts left the way he made them, intact. This botched up medical community also still does not accept gay blood, saying it could be tainted with HIV. These bureaucracies are hypocrites. Why on earth would anyone trust what this establishment tells us when this stupid virus cannot even be found? They don't even tell you that viruses are not living creatures. If any of what those who are lost in the world of HIV/AIDS confusion made made sense, we would feel a lot better, but unfortunately, they keep contradicting themselves, changing their stories, and making heads spin. What they do next is sell you something to stop all that spinning. HIV/AIDS is a mixed up attempt at defining disease, and a horrific holocaust that is poisoning healthy individuals when they simply have the flu and test "positive" because the test cannot decipher which antibody is which.
HIV/AIDS/DE/FINED
They removed the fines when they learned HIV/AIDS is a poor description of a complex set of conditions that the human body and mind has been subjected to since 1984. Better definitions of health problems include calling each disease by it's own name instead of dumping them all into a broader category called AIDS.
Viruses Multiply
Do they divide, add, and subtract? I didn't know they knew math so well. When we step a few football fields away from all the scientific klaims about viruses, it's hard to understand how a non-living particle of matter has an ability to "multiply". Logic would dictate that a grain of sand, or a stone would only multiply if you smashed it into a million pieces with a hammer. Living cells divide and multiply, taking non living particles of matter and using them to grow. They are alive. Viruses are not, they are like small particles of sand.
STUDY/HARD
After all, it's your life and your loving family of cells that need looking out for, and they are looking out for you.
STUDY/MORE
Disco Balls Scientifically Proven 2 Keep Heads Spinning
** It's starve science, feed your cells whole food/watch your cells multiply, divide, add, and subtract, and with their new math skills, apply for jobs in calculating waste.
*** it looks like your computing
device has swallowed
loads of information now
|
