|
|
|
MAKE/PEACE "It's like trying to protect your home from flies when you have no screens, and all of your doors and windows are wide open.... but we suggest people use condoms anyway because it's all we have." [ paraphrased statement by a medical spokesperson, ref/name to update] VIRUSES ARE SMALLER THAN THE HOLES IN CONDOMS
At the beginning of the epidemic of fear it was stated by the medical authorities that we should all use condoms, but when you EXAMINE CAREFULLY things that are said, especially the statement above, which was offered up by a medical professional at the beginning of this entire mess, you just might realize it's absurd to expect condoms to protect you. Where does that leave us? It leaves us to realize that viruses aren't the threat that we have been told by those who have vested interests in getting you to believe their stories, mostly by those who push and prod people like cattle into getting tested and fed poisons. # 2 there isn't one test, there are multiple strains Did you know there isn't one single HIV test, there are many? People keep saying they are "positive" OR "negative" but in reality, no one knows anyone's status when we scrutinize the whole HIV debacle. There are a number of reasons for this, including the fact that "testing for HIV" is different throughout the world. There are no absolute standards. Test results vary depending on who's doing the testing. Tests only find antibodies and are non-specific. Testing is consistently infected with false positives and negatives, that is why they ask if you are in a "risk group". Viruses are stupid, they don't know what kind of sex you have. Viruses are not prejudice, but HIV diagnosis can be. The test, if it was accurate should determine status all by itself. Testing procedures are even different at different organizations providing testing in America. Even the fine print of these tests state "not to be used for diagnostic purposes" yet they are being used for that very thing. Testing is so flawed we found one sample of blood that was sent to 19 different labs, and what came back was 19 DIFFERENT RESULTS! What we saw was ink blots, 19 different ink blots! This is what they look at when they "interpret results", INK BLOTS. Remember interpreting ink blots in grade school? You saw what you wanted to see. Your friends saw something different. The teacher (authority) saw something else. Who was correct? If you have tested positive, and want to test negative with these random testing protocols, you might try going to another country. One of the most shocking things that the HIV community continues to ignore, or is just not aware of, is that when labs dilute the serum like normal, like every other blood tests, everyone reacts positive! They had to change the standard protocol just to find some negatives! What kind of science is that?
# 3 size does matter Viruses are millions of times smaller than a speck of dust. When was the last time you were afraid of dust? And why do they keep calling viruses alive when by all technical definitions, viruses are dead matter. They don't breathe, they don't eat, they don't have any living qualities. The only way they "live" is by being moved around like a rock in a stream bed. Bacteria, fungus, and parasites are alive, not viruses. Injecting them in your arm as some sort of means of protecting your self from getting them makes no sense. Let your body create it's own response IF they ever come in, don't force them in. Vaccination, especially with something that is claimed to be deadly, is ludicrous, and to make botched scientific matters worse, people are shocked to learn that there really is no test for AIDS as these tests only find antibodies which are natural to everyone. Antibodies are like watchdogs they are good protection already. Have we been told the whole story about a virus labeled HI, or did we actually become infected with various strains of misleading information?
# 4 viruses blow in the wind & are not to be feared For one, viruses are said to be like heads without a body. This has been stated by even the HIV/AIDS groups themselves. Since when are you worried about a head attacking you? Next, it has been stated that HIV is primarily sexually transmitted and not found in the air. Yet when we give viruses an exam, we see that viruses are 1,000,000 times lighter than a feather. How can viruses NOT be carried in the wind? It simply is NOT TRUE that HIV is only transmitted sexually, yet we are told this by everyone promoting HIV. There is no property of HIV that disallows it from being carried up in the air. The cause of AIDS and other complex syndromes and diseases are multiple and very complex, multi-causal. Immune deficiencies are not caused by having sexual encounters, they are caused by chemicals attacking the cells, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, and other huge factors, not that of something that is so miniscule even a tiny ant could stomp on it's head and kill it (head without a body.....already dead!). The science that deemed there was a killer virus in our semen, or as they politically correctly say, in body fluids, is political in nature, based on peer pressures, political demands, and other factors that just do not hold up to good scientific scruitiny. Find me something in the literature on HIV that explains the exact properties of this special virus that makes it only attach itself to semen. There is NONE. It doesn't exist. These claims are continually spewed forth that HIV is only transmitted sexually but the science is not there. There is no virus in the world that is impervious to being kicked up by the wind, absolutely none. Where this takes is is having to evaluate multiple causes as if this is true, that HIV could be in the air, then everyone would get it. This also takes us here, that if everyone could simply breath in the little critter, then how come not everyone gets sick? Because HIV, as this thing is labeled, is just a particle of matter, just like dust, the body grabs it with mucus, and expells it since it's not a vitamin or mineral and is not needed. Every virus, atom, proton, neutron, speck of sand or dust, everything in small enough form, can travel in the air. Thus, we are forced to discard, when we understand this basic truth, discard the STD theory of HIV.
Those who promote HIV/AIDS it's actually over TWO THOUSAND!
HIV UNSURE? your status
may depend on where you live!
YOU CAN
TEST DIFFERENTLY
There
are no conspiracy theories
Many people have dumped viral
causation theories If viruses were the problem we all would have been infected. They are not even living organisms and if they are in the body an immune response takes care of eliminating them, down the toilet! They say they attack the immune system. That's like saying sand attacks the sea shore. Your house remains standing when those little particles of sand and viruses infect your beach community and blood streams.
Do drug companies want to end AID$ ?
PCR - the very inventor of the Polymerize Chain Reaction test, which revolutionized genetic science and engineering, and who won the Nobel Prize for it's creation in 1993, chemist and author Dr. Kary Mullis says it's not being used as it should be in "testing for HIV". So who are these hucksters that keep promoting testing as accurate when the very creators of the foundational principles of some of the tests being used are not being used as they were intended?
declare an end to gay politics as usual demand your right to vote in gay elections
The list of scientists that have ended AIDS keeps growing! Gonzalo
Ernesto Sepulveda Estay - Psychiatry Resident, Family Medicine Specialist ....
We are ending AIDS. We can't help it if others refuse to follow our lead. I think what we got infected with is TABLOID/SCIENCE.
|
|
|
this entire website carries the gay community seal of approval
|
