testing as far back as 1988 showed there are absolutely no absolutes

Where did I get this data?

One place of many sources is the Journal of the American Medical Associan - JAMA** 1988 and college university libraries.  At the beginning of the fear campaigns in the mid 1980's, media outlets were saying that a new disease had struck gays.  I went to the university library and looked up the "new disease" and it wasn't new at all.  There were medical textbooks that described it that were published in the 1950's.  They documented cases from the 1930's.  The "new disease" was merely "new to some".  They came up with new labels.  They came up with new causes, a NEW/VIRUS.  They came up with a new test.  They fought over patent rights.  Some won, some lost.  Here we are.

Testing the results

To try to rectify and justify the multiple strains of errors that these tests provide, the doctors and technicians start asking you questions and make judgments on your behavior.  Why do they need to do this if testing was accurate?  You may think you are "positive" or "negative" yet most of these tests only find naturally occurring ANTIBODIES found in every human being, every day of their lives.  EVERYONE tests positive for antibodies.  They are always there.  They are there to defend.  Blotches on the Western Blot show various antibodies and other matter, that's it, nothing evil.

Antibody testing finds the good guys

Examination even further shows that testing only finds non-specific arbitrary antibodies, and what we like to call magic arbitrary markers.  They are the little defenders in your immune system that pack quite a punch, and found there every day of your life, every day of your life.  Finding them is like finding the police driving through your neighborhood, and finding that they have a police station in the area, they are just around the corner if you decide you have to call them in.  Just because antibodies and the police are there, doesn't mean any crime has been committed, or will be committed.

click here to view image again and see if you can find the positive result

If you can't find a positive or negative on the above pink framed 19 test results, then how am I supposed to believe you, or anyone, knows if someone is really positive or negative?  People say they are + or -, yet the good science shows that no one really can tell from ink blots, but they can imagine things.

I guess they are experts at guessing

I want to find experts at finding exact results, not guesses.  If you tell me you are "positive" I don't believe you.  You cannot know for sure since testing has been well documented as being full of errors.  Doctors and lab workers who interpret the varied results are making outrageous guesses.  Knowing the truth behind testing, it's impossible to believe anyone's claim of status.   Where does that leave us?  In a war zone.  It's time to pull out.

Behavior testing

Testing is not specific, it relies on asking you questions.  That's not specific in itself and already subject to error due to what is said by the patient.  They could lie, or simply not know how to answer the question.  There are arbitrary, non-specific concepts of what is "risky sex" and how many times someone needs to be fucked in the ass to be at risk.  If you say you never get fucked by anything except by the medical profession, you will likely be given the healthy green light "negative" status.  If you say you have anal intercourse, of course they will put you in a "risk group" and this influences how they decide what your "status" is.    

Stuck in overdrive

There is no clear result on any of the tests used to "find it".  Part of what determines a positive or negative is if you say you had "risky sex".   Why do they have to ask these questions?  Does the test find the virus or not?  Actually NOT.  Good testing protocols, as with finding anemia (low iron in blood) use exact well proven testing protocols, and preferred methods.  In testing for anemia, they don't have to ask if you have risky eating habits, and they don't have to even ask what you eat every day, they simply do a reliable testing of the blood in which they can actually see the blood cells under the microscope.  

In my 20+ years of study on this new label called WAR/ZONE, the only consistent thing I have found is errors in the orthodox medical approach and their definitions, and errors in the principles behind vaccination, and some horrific flaws in the concept that declaring war in the body is going to create harmony.

I tend to like things that are accurate, ABSOLUTE, and well proven without contradictions, especially when it comes to claims made that I could suffer wrath of God/Satan or some new virus where somehow they claim that if I have sex with the wrong person I can end up getting infected with some horrible new m4m plague.  

They say I tested o2 Negative

Actually I'm o2 Positive that immune deficiency syndromes are much too complex and multifaceted to have one itsy bitsy teeny weenie cause.  When we scrutinize these disease theories and testing protocols in depth, we as in myself and those listed on the 2,621 doubters list we find that in reality, no one knows their status, no one.  The "results" are all guesses made by those who keep calling themselves experts.  They are in the same class of "experts" that studied planetary science, who have consistently told us that Pluto is a planet, after all it was incredibly well documented science, who can argue science?  Actually the question is who can argue votes?  In 2006 these experts finally changed their minds after saying this for 72 years, they changed their minds by a vote, and are telling us it's not a planet anymore, it's a piece of ice.  It was a scientific VOTE that changed a fact to a new fact.  And with further study, we find that there were dissidents since the beginning saying that Pluto was not a planet.  For 72 years there were dissidents that said Pluto was ice.  Science is often riddled with errors, guesses, and scientific votes based on politics.  They then present the results of their votes as "fact".  They are in fact a vote much of the time and only a vote.

The V is for Voodoo

Why get tested?  Who made this stuff up?  Why do they get MAD every time I talk about the errors in testing?  These mad scientists keep getting mixed up, I'm not the one who started all this nonsense.  19 tests presented 19 different readings when using the same blood, yet they refuse to admit this error is huge, so much so that it undermines the entire basis of testing, along with countless other errors that have been continually shown to contradict their theories of viral causation of complex diseases from the start in the early 1980's.  Antibody testing does not even find a specific virus, it only finds antibodies.  Antibodies are cool.  The way they "determine" your status is asking you if you had what someone deemed to be "risky sex".  What is risky about sex?  Transmitting a virus that cannot be found?  The air does that every day.

click here to view image again and see if you can find ANY specific result

If you still cannot find the exact positive or negative result in the above series of 19 tests with the same blood sample, print it out, take it to your doctor, lab, or scientist, and ask for them to point out where the positive or negative result is, simply by looking at that series of 19 different results, then ask them to provide you a copy of your lab results, like this picture, of a strip, or numerous strips, not their interpretation which uses "risk factors" they claim help them determine your status.  Tell them you don't know if the person's blood in the 19 strips was bloody risky, sexy, or neither, just have them point out where the + or - is located there.  

They can't.

Their testing is not a good testing mechanism at all, it only finds what is naturally occurring in everyone every day of their lives, defenders called antibodies, and it doesn't find any specific one at all.  Basing decisions on the state of your health by using testing that provides results that are all over the map is risky, a lot more risky than sex has ever been unless you are having sex while walking a tightrope.  For some, this is exactly what the masters of virus hogwash do, leading people down a path of experimental DRUGS/POISONS that are well proven to be extremely toxic to any blood cell in your body that touches them, much like how bug spray is to bugs.  That sounds like risky stuff.  Testing for the virus, if there really is such a thing (being particular about clear and precise definitions), has too many guesses involved.  Some call WAR/ZONES a botched attempt at finding causes, attempts at cures, and treatments, most with good intentions, but horribly flawed, and lumping too many diseases under one category which cannot possibly have one viral cause.

Hysteria In Virology

Viruses don't live they are dead matter and the scientists in virology that say they are alive are misleading everyone claiming viral warfare is the answer.  I hate all kinds of war.  

These days if you are gay and don't "know your status" people look at you like you are from outer space.  This is the most bizarre thing I have ever seen in the gay rights movement.  I'm no longer accepted if I don't get tested!  

I can't stand being asked "my status".  I go to a gay cruising or dating site and guys either post their status on their profiles, or there is a question on the "create profile" section.  I want a response that says "it's a hoax".  Maybe there's an accurate test on Pluto.  Has your doctor studied science past Uranus?  Ask your doctor or scientist to take a vote, as they did with whether or not Pluto is/was a planet, and let you know if the thing is a virus, rock, speck of minute dead matter, or all of the above, or if the thing is only in their imagination.  Ask to see ACTUAL photos (throw out computer models as they are simply renderings of scientifik imagination) of "the virus" and ask them to explain how it breathes, eats, and shits, like EVERY LIVING CREATURE, as they claim, if "it's alive".  

It's there in the looking glass Dorothy

Once upon a horrible time, we looked through the TV and saw torrents of information flooding into our homes.  In the 70's they blamed cancer on a virus.  In the 1980's they started scaring us and selling the world their VIRAL/WARES.  Gays started demanding drugs while "Say No To Drugs" was a campaign to help people to not do drugs.  Go figure.  People demanded the government intervention to find a solution.  Margaret Heckler and Dr. C. Everett Koop started making announcements that something or other caused a horrible new disease, even though the science was not absolute, and the diseases were not new at all.  Imagine that, stating something as fact when it is not yet absolute (happened with Pluto as well).  Political pressure is a strange thing.  

Science in wonderland

Ahhhhh, how we have progressed.  Now the people on TV news are saying that scientists are saying their findings are saying that GETTING FAT is caused by a virus.  

See a pattern here yet?  Everything is caused by a virus.  It makes people who claim to study these things, very well compensated for their time, that's the good thing, for them.

The foundation of most of these viral causation hoaxes theories contains certain concepts that scientifically have been proven false, yet, much like deep religious beliefs that cannot be shaken, the ones about viruses remain a part of many belief systems no matter how much you show people the facts.  People just either get duped by these slick ads for drugs and testing, or they just don't really know the facts and foundations of how most of medical research ends up being a vote.  This same thing occured with that former planet Pluto, where for 72 years it was called a planet, an absolute scientific fact, even though there were plenty of dissidents saying it wasn't a planet at all.  Still, it was in the textbooks, taught as absolute fact, until once upon a time, it finally was deemed to be a mere piece of ice.  "My logic is undeniable" is what was said by both scientists....and robots.

Well then, take a vote

The scientific process is a funny thing.  Science often makes declarations of fact, when in FACT, they are merely a VOTE..  

New labels for old things with horrifically worse treatments!

Labels are not sexually transmitted, semen is.  Semen is safe.  If you doubt this, ask your doctor to test your semen for viruses.  Ever wonder why, if sex is the route, why aren't they testing the semen directly?  That would be the most effective and reliable place to find it right?  

Sin Dromes

The new horror is merely a syndrome.  You cannot acquire sexually transmitted syndromes, nor can you acquire sexually transmitted diseases, they are labels that describe rather poorly, very complex conditions.  Again, say this pledge of allegiance:  "You cannot acquire sexually transmitted syndromes.  The thing you can acquire is a virus, parasite, bacteria, or fungus, all of which can be easily transmitted by the air itself.  If we are to strive for accuracy, then the term STD is false advertising and should be erradicated.  The term should be replaced with STVBPAOF - Sexually Transmitted Virus Bacteria Parasite and or Fungus."

Only one route of travel

They say certain viruses cannot travel by air.  That is a lie.  If it cannot, have someone explain in detail what exact property of it makes it impervious to being kicked up by the winds.  Let's use an extreme example, does your scientist or doctor believe that the killer virus cannot be moved around in a hurricane?  Absurd you say?  Why?  Is the virus too heavy?  Is it glued to the penis?  Is it stuck on cells?  Is it stuck like band-aids?  Can't it get out?  Is the only way it does through my penis?  What happens when it leaves my penis and lands on the floor?  Where's the evidence that it can not travel by air?  What happens if someone jerks off in a hurricane, where does the virus go?  It dies?  It's already dead, viruses are non living matter.  The fact that viruses are not living is extremely well proven science.  Does this voodoo virus they call scary death drop like a rock thus it cannot be carried by the wind?  If it drops like a rock, what happens if someone is under it?  

GO OFF ROAD HERE

Most viral professionals would scoff the statements and questions above as non-sense.  They generally think it's been studied, and they simply pass on the information handed to them.  But it's solid scientific fact, a virus has no property that keeps it locked down in such a way that it can never be airborne.  The reason they came up with the concept that it cannot be airborne, was a political vote in the 1980's to calm people's fears, not by true rock solid science.

The strange theories of viral causation have all been disproved long ago, yet many well meaning scientists, and people who represent health care, refuse to let it go for various reasons, one of which is it's just too hard to believe that so many people could be wrong, after all, 99.99% of the population believes in the power, control, and domination a virus can have over us.  There are many ways to show how the theory is a hoax, fraud, or at minimum, a big huge blunder.

Getting whacked to the ground by something they can't actually see or find

People don't die and get sick from one particle of non-living matter called a virus and they don't obtain disease simply by sexually expressing themselves or worshiping God in this way sexually.  Disease is a condition of the body, often extremely complex.  Complex disease conditions of the body do not hop over to another person via the sex organs.  Diseases are created within the body due to multiple factors.  A primary one, is environment.  As with the earth, when it is polluted, like when there is an oil tanker spill, the body of water gets diseased.  The thing that was transferred to this body of water was crude oil, not even any virus, bacteria, paracite, or fungus.  These are all in the air we breathe every day.  

Pasteurizing the postulations

The routine and often state mandated boiling of milk and other foods to kill off all bacteria, also kills off the good bacteria your body needs.  Did you know you have good bacteria in your digestive system and bad?  When we eat fresh raw fruits and vegetables we keep a healthy environment within, and the bad concepts of viruses, bacteria, and disease get flushed out daily.  

Louis Pasteur changed all that, when he announced his theory that disease is due to microbes and that we need to "protect ourselves" and "declare war on microbes".

In response to those silly claims, Dr. Robert Koch, a German scientist, laid down four conditions that must be met before the theory could be regarded as scientifically proven.  These conditions are called "Koch's postulates," which were incautiously accepted by Pasteur and his subalterns and echoes, as reasonable.  They are:

There is not a single germ that is held responsible for a single so-called disease that fully meets a single one of these conditions, nor one that ever meets all four of them.  Thus, either Koch is an idiot, or the concepts that "germs cause disease" and "viruses are sexually transmitted and cause death" are ludicrous.  In fact, did you know your ancestors are germs?  In fact, you came from a germ.  Semen is a germ in the highest technical sense of what germs are and are not.  

Look it up, I don't make this stuff up they do.

Are you F positive

Viruses causing complex immune disease syndromes do not pass the Koch postulate test at all and get an F positive grade.  All disease is caused by complex factors that are multiple, varied, and develop over time.  Diseases are created, not caught like at a baseball game.  They are not even caused by one germ, virus, bacteria, or fungus even as the body normally clears out these things it doesn't want around, though when we compare viruses to the latter three aforementioned, we are comparing dust to termites (dead matter to living organisms).  Quite possibly the most outrageous misrepresentation of the medical and scientific INDUSTRY is  that one certain type of virus is EXCLUSIVELY transmitted sexually, and the others can become airborne.  This is impossible as noted in the laws of physics.  ALL particles of viral matter can become airborne.  There is absolutely no evidence presented anywhere that proves any certain virus has certain properties that make it only attracted to semen and bodily fluids.  That's so easy to disprove, as bodily fluids are exposed to air every day.  If a certain threat was in any bodily fluid when the liquid evaporated, what would remain is that threat, and the wind or a sneeze could easily carry it through the air.

But it's living they say..... actually it's not living at all, viruses are dead matter

Er, no it's not.  They say that it's a threat as it's alive!  Viruses are dead.  Viruses are dead.  They are dead matter, and Some viruses are not even current, they are retro.  A retro virus is not a recent one, it's retro.  If you know anything about retro, think about 50's retro, and Elvis impersonators.  People and viruses impersonate, but they are never the real thing and cannot ever accomplish what the original did.  The imposter in retro may entertain us or our surrounding cellscape if they are good, but they will NEVER be able to do what the original did long ago.  Many people believe that viruses are "alive".  It is probably the biggest set of misspellings on the human race ever.  A cell is alive, but not a virus, or even any virus in the cell.  How they claim it is "alive" is due to when the cell moves it around, then it's alive "so as not to confuse you".  This is about as accurate as saying that a pebble floating merrily down the stream is alive due to it's movement.  A virus can "wreak havoc" only in a similar sense as with a pebble in that stream, the movement can throw it into things and cause wear.  Cells eliminate such pebbles/viruses.  It's in the textbooks.  I didn't make this up.  Viruses are actually dead miniscule particles of matter.  If you are afraid of viruses, compare size.  You are huge, viruses are so small you cannot even see them.  Your blood cells have the ability to squash them like a bug, but since they are not alive like bugs, when your cells get "infected" with them like a home gets infected with dust, it just cleans them out and down the toilet or in the trash.

The most horrific thing about the gay holocaust is the fact that too many people have been led on cell destructive path of forcing toxic chemicals they call "meds" deep into the soul of each cell, at which time these cells often commit suicide as they just can't take the poison.  It's like when they dump toxic waste into the blood stream, the good critters in the stream die.  

You couldn't pay me a 99.999 million dollars to take 99.999% of viral meds

Besides the fact that you don't have that much money to entice me with, consider this, they say take protease inhibitors to kill the virus.  Protease is a natural enzyme needed to process and digest protein, making the amino acids available for cell restoration and replication.  Inhibit protease you inhibit protein breakdown, thus you inhibit the natural process of cellular repair.  

Anti-body

They said in their videos that were made and published without the internet or Flash, way back in 1987 "The test finds antibodies."  So what, antibodies are good, they are like the National Guard or a good watchdogs on a dude ranch.  When things are normal they just play or do other things, when they need to be called in they show up to defend.  What does it mean in your community when the National Guard has been called in?  Does it mean you have to declare war?  It doesn't mean anything in itself, they are just defenders.  If your dog starts barking does that mean there's a threat?  Maybe, but usually not, it just means there's activity nearby.  If there is a threat for which the NG's have been called in, they go home after they get done and there is peace.  

In your blood these National Antibodies and their German Shepardbodies are there, and can be found regardless if they are doing anything to fight, or if they are just staying home.  Ask yourself, is there any science that unequivocally and indisputably proves that antibodies are at war every moment?  I haven't found it.  Finding antibodies in these so called viral finding tests is simply finding things that are there to defend.

At war with labels

Testing is mislabeled, it is merely a test that finds ANTIBODIES, not even any one specific type of antibody, and most certainly, these tests do not find any one SPECIFIC type of virus.

a positive response means resistance

I don't fight wars on viruses, I let my body flush them out naturally.  I don't need chemical warfare in my village of peaceful cells.  I don't get tested with tests that are infected with unreliability.

Multiple testing protocols for even the simplest measurement

I would think using a ruler and sticking it in there would do the job in measuring a lake, but The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which uses a different measuring technique than the Environmental Research Laboratory, calculated the September 2007 level of Lake Superior at 4 inches below the record set in 1928.   This is the same group of engineers (Army Corps) that said the levees were safe in New Orleans.  Actually, that's an overgeneralization.  More accurately stated would be, years ago, some officials at the top of the Army Corps of Engineers said the levees were safe [enough].  

Massive failures everywhere in science

"It's not clear whether the original has become lighter, or the national prototypes have become heavier," said Michael Borys, a senior researcher with Germany's national measures institute in Braunschweig. "But by definition, only the original represents exactly a kilogram."  This was stated about the shriking kilogram, and the fact that scientists don't even know why, with such a basic thing like the kilogram, the master unit of measure is not remaining standardized. 

Disparaging Agreements

When there is more than one testing method, we need to start asking questions, digging deeper, and not necessarily relying on just what is stated by "authorities" as it is well documented throughout history that they quite often make mistakes and multiple strains of errors, in particular, when there are disagreements amongst them about how to test accurately.  Most certainly, when there are such disagreements disparsed throughout the world, regarding tests, it would be even wiser to not go around and proclaiming a test result as absolute.

It's Huge / No It's Not

Look at the chart below, viruses are in the 10-7 micrometer range.  Holes that naturally occur in condoms are 100 times bigger.  

Sexually active vehicle transmission routes near 66

My truck's got balls and it those balls transfer horse power.  Exaggerating size and concepts and saying things that are not technically accurate is nothing new.  There is nothing deadly about a man's cock regardless of how big it is and how often it shoots.  They don't shoot bullets nor do they kill messengers.  They are just cocks meant to shoot sperm into a man's throat.  If anyone can find anything deadly in sperm please provide the evidence.  There is none.  The only thing that exists is drama and conjecture.  There is no sperm testing.  Think about that for a minute.  Why are they not testing my sperm if that's where it is?   Hmmm.  Try asking any lab for sperm work.  See what they say.  I did this once, they freaked out.  They couldn't give me an explanation why other than "There is no such thing".  What the hell kind of science is this anyway?  It's like saying you have a problem with your transmission, and they test the radiator fluid.

A solution

When anyone tries to download Fear Of Viruses into your brain you can cancel your registration by going here to start the process.

Fight The Hysterical Information Vituperation Syndrome To Win

E N D / W A R

If you have proof that killer dead virus tomatoes exist, please provide evidence.  We will pass on the information to the appropriate mills for processing. 

Some of our tactical positions include:  

a)  mandatory testing of testing
  
i)   surgically removing errors in the medical community (top priority)

d)  perfecting practice

s)  wear cammo gear

e)  sexually active study

x)  a gradual pulling out of the war on disease

y)  k

notes to study later:

Global Positioning Testing Systems are also said to be accurate.  Low cost receivers have a 100 meter accuracy.  That's an "accuracy" within 328.08399 Feet.  Think about this for a moment.  Imagine what you would do with such "accurate" data when after learning this, you quickly EXIT the doctor's office in the darkness, when right outside his bewildering medical claims office is a 500 foot cliff.  Reference 328.08399 Feet GPS data here: link

Miss Informed keeps making the rounds

A recent study of the 911 octillion studies already performed by sci-fientists used Facial Analogous Recognition Technology, also known as FART.  It's results garnered a 60 percent match success rate during optimal lighting conditions.  That's during optimal lighting conditions!  92% of the time lighting is not optimal, thus the accuracy of the results are more like this:

60% of 8% = 4.8% accuracy rate in testing

The study claimed accuracy plummeted as low as 10 percent in low-light situations.  Imagine basing the rest of your life on that.  Not very restful.  The law enforcement agency tolerated a false positive rate of 0.1 percent, or 23 people of the roughly 23,000 that passed through the train station where the study was done.  This was a real study.  This means, 23 people were targeted as "infected" with this technological error. This is AGAINST THE LAW OF REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF ERRORS.  23 lives get changed forever due to being infected with testing.  This is not the most horrific of errors.  What is?  It is when gay men, get their "test results", claim their status is this way or that way, thinking it is accurate, and poison themselves to death.  

more concepts

Retro Fit The Virus
it's what scientists try to do with a virus that continually tries to work with GLBT organizations to get them to understand that it's not the original, it's a retro, but they never listen.

The Latency Virus
it's what affects the core of finding the whole truth when it comes to fact finding in many scientific studies.

Church of Virology a place for ritual designed to keep your head full of imaginary debris.  

Viral Voodo 
the Satanic cult that encourages one to ingest toxic poisons in order to be "saved" from things that cannot be seen.  This sort of happened once before with the Jim Jones cult.  

The War Against Humidity
some use the medical approach.  Others are against all wars, including wars on wheather, whether or not you agree with their war strategies on weather or other matters of thought processes.

Unprotected Breathing
people expose themselves to risky air every day.  This is how some get malaria or "mal air".
Stop funding the war.   We do/not promote goofy/testing, condumbs, safe-sex, or other politically charged-up conditions decided to be fact based on votes and horrible science. 

"Open your mind and your eyes and look at the facts. There is no such thing as a specific test for scary killer virus or tomato particles, so all these numbers you relate to infections are pure fiction."

elmates

Why anyone would put their lives in the hands of professional guessers?

We are gay to promote RE/THINKING, free-sex as it was in the 1970's, bare back riding on horses or men, and chemical free living.  

**image ref. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988, reference link: the western blot test