Testing is NOT APPROVED for use as a
diagnostic tool as "there is no recognized standard for establishing
the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV in human blood" as stated on
the very label of the tests themselves!
It's right there on the label and disclaimers. These
warnings/inserts keep the manufacturers from being sued, while instead, you get
screwed with someone's wild nuts and bolts theories on what causes outrageously
complex problems with health. It's like finding a disclaimer on a
screwdriver that says it has not been approved for individual use to screw,
unless there are screws loose, but go ahead and use them anyway to screw massive
bolts down to secure cables on the Golden Gate Bridge but we are not liable.
Some medical professionals even use these tests to diagnose so called
"infection" when people are in perfect health. If a result comes
back "positive" the individual gets diagnosed as having an infection
deep down somewhere inside their body where it can strike anytime in the next 20
years, even though all indications in the mind and body say the person is
perfectly healthy. That my dear, sounds a too much like bible thumping
fundamentalist crap, where they say you are a sinner and have to be saved, and
on and on. Follow their path and you really get screwed.
That's a fact!
Keep in mind, anytime anyone tells you something is fact, first
reference, the fact that there was a planet called Pluto, that in fact, in 2006
changed this fact into a rock or piece of ice. It was scientific fact for
72 years, based on votes in the "scientific community". Science
is full of errors. Calculations and determinations are made 99.9% of the
time when there is missing & incomplete data, and the data has so many
variables, an absolute conclusion is impossible, yet, facts are facts they say.
Testing only provides an F minus result
The science teacher graded The Western Blot with an F minus.
He went on to explain