studying dead particles of matter and
their effect on mass unconsciousness
Viruses
are called "alive" because they sometimes move around like
rocks in a blood red or white stream bed. Viruses have no life of their own.
Viruses do not eat. Viruses do not breathe. Viruses do not
reproduce because they are not living. Viruses "replicate" they
say, but when we look at botany, the science that studies everything
going on with living plants, the word
"replicate" means "fold back on itself" as a
leaf. Rocks and boulders which are not living things also
"replicate" but cannot "fold back", they are crushed or worn down due to erosion
into a smaller particles. That's what happens with viruses, they break down into smaller
pieces which is called "replication".
They do not reproduce, they cannot as they are not alive, they
replicate, they
crack up into smaller pieces each time getting smaller
and smaller like rocks through erosion. The total amount never
changes. If you have one pound of viruses that replicate,
when they are done replicating you still have one pound of viruses.
Example:
You have a 1 pound rock, it breaks down into smaller pieces. The sum
total of these small pieces is 1 pound. Same with viruses.
If you have 1 billigram of virus, that "replicates" into smaller pieces, yes you have more of them, but they are
smaller in size and weight, you still have only 1 billigram total of
"replicated" viruses. Is the threat more or the
same? In studying the DNA of virology one of the most prevalent
conditions we find is this error in understanding the nature of
what is being told to us about what viruses really are, like rocks.
Viruses
are only as alive as rocks flowing in the stream are living due to
"movement". These mini rock viruses could be a threat if
there was a sufficient supply that was allowed to get in you, for
example, in your lungs due to excessive blowing of them through the air,
but in the case of viruses claimed to infect people, testing
can not even accurately find them! "Where are they?"
we have to ask. They can hardly be seen or found. Only a few
scientists claim they "have seen them" through exorbitantly
expensive hard to find electron microscopes, and scrutiny has shown
their photos of some of those that are most terrifying are mere computer
models. Why are we so scared of things that are not even
alive? It's simple, the story tellers, many of them from
Holllywood, to TV news, to the scientists and doctors themselves, have
scared us into believing they are the cause of so many things that have
never been fully proven to do what they say.
---------
by Schramm,
Zillig, & Bawden
In F. C. Bawden's 1961 paper,
"The Susceptibility of Rhoeo discolor to Infection by Tobacco Mosaic
Virus", he talks about a paper released previously by Gordon and Smith.
In this paper by Gordon and
Smith they claim to have demonstraited that Rhoeo discolor can not be infected
by whole TMV paticles, but can be infected by naked TMV RNA. This was put forth
to provide evidence that in order for the whole TMV partilce to cause disease
the plant must be able to remove the viruses coat protein so that RNA can then
do its thing.
This would also imply that TMV
really is a particle where the RNA naturally does have protiens wraped around
it. My suspicion on all this is that TMV preprationa are not a natural
phenominon, but are in fact an artifical mixture of tubule protiens, a strip of
RNA that codes for an disease causing enzyme, and water. The water and the
RNA combine to form a thick vicous gel like material as RNA is a polymere that
is hydrophilic. The tubule protiens can then be crystalized in this RNA mess to
form a liquid crystal gel mixture. In doing this some of the RNA will be, albiet
imperfectly, caught up in the tuble protiens as they crystalize. Faster
crystalizeation will increase the amount of ensnared RNA.. However the gel like
nature of the preperation suggest that much of the RNA is still naked.
Going back to Gordon and
Smith, Bawden explain however that their data is "inconclusive". You
see when Gorden and Smith demonsrtated that naked RNA could cause disease they
used a solution concetreation of 20 mg per liter of the naked RNA. When they
showed that the whole virus, (a mixture of RNA, protein, and water), could not
cause infection they used only a solution concetration of .5 mg per liter. In
the words of Bawden, "....which is only 0.00125 as much nucleic acid".
So clearly that tiny
tiny amount of RNA would not produce noticeable disease effects. This is not
"inconclusive" work. This is scientific fraud. This is scientifuc
fraud being done with the very first virus ever discover. This is scientific
fraud at the base of virology. This is exactly the kind of nonsense that
retrovirologists engage in today. This is a very clear unambiguous example of
the kinds of stuff virologist will do to prove their theries.
Another interesting thing is
just how crude and blatent this fraud was. Like anyone would not notice what
they did. The fact that they would do such an obvious fraud suggest that this
kind of stuff was acceptable amoung virologist. Bawden himself does not cry foul
on this. He just calls it "inconclusive".
---------
Another interesting thing I
read in a general overview paper on TMV research was that Schramm and
Zillig in 1955 found that the protien subunits from TMV particles could, without
the RNA, assemble into the rod shapped particles. This is important cause in any
basic text book on virology or biology you will most likely be told that the RNA
determines the shape of the virus by acting like a backbone. Thus claiming that
the RNA is needed for the proteins to coil up. However this is not true at all.
This is very consitent with my
view that what is photographed and called TMV partiles are in fact tubule cell
strutures, either classic microtubuels or something very similiar. If my view is
correct then it would have to be the case that the rode structure is a nature
phenominon resulting from the nature of the proteins themselves. And that is
what Schramm and Zillg showed in 1955. This is also evidence for my view that
the mixture of RNA and protien and water, to form a gel, that is called
TMV is in fact an artificial prepration of unrelated materials.
---------
The
reason we can do it is the evidence is overwhelming that >?x exists.
We have pictures. We have budding virus. We have the virus itself.
We know what its inner workings look like through crystallography.
There's a lot of things you can't see under a standard microscope -- you
have to use high-powered rainbow technology. You need
technological advances to see it, Sometimes you have to first go
to the moon, then to Pluto, then to Uranus, but it can be found.
The data is overwhelming that it's transmissible, and the data is
overwhelming that drugs that interfere with its replication lead to
healthy patients, sometimes. These are absolute communicable data
transmissions. These are absolute fax.
In
San Francisco they pay people to take the test. For a while you couldn't go to
the "gay beach" in Dolores Park without some public health lackey
approaching you and offering you $10 to get tested. Paradoxically, though,
if you go in on your own they can refuse you, even though you paid good money up
front. A couple of years ago my partner (who believes in these things) insisted
I go get tested. So I went in to City Clinic and paid my $10, and during the
interview (there is always an interview) I answered "no" to all the
questions ("have you had passive anal sex in the last 6 months", etc).
The lady interviewing me did not pick up on the fact I was lying, even though I
contradicted myself a couple of times. In fact at one point she literally threw
up her hands and said "So what are you doing here?" She refused my
request for a test, although they did agree to do one for syphilis. My partner
has since come around a little, and I never went back.
The Spam Virus
Viruses
are infinite. To rid itself of a virus that it doesn't like, it
makes a mirror image of it, attaches itself to it, and flushes it
away. In the world of spam, the reason we now have only one out of
20 messages being real, and not spam, is that the number of email
addresses spammers use is infinite. The most absurd and obvious
flaw in the vaccination theory is that it is impossible to vaccinate
against an infinite number of viruses, especially those billions that
have not yet been discovered or created. I say created but should
say evolved. Viruses evolve. They change. They
morph. The body always matches them, and flushes them away if it
has the building blocks it needs to do so. Building blocks do not
consist of bizarre chemical, animal part, mercury, and other ingredients
commonly found in flu vaccines and other vaccines. Building blocks
consist of natural minerals, vitamins, protein, water, essential to
rebuilding every cell in the body, and eliminating those that die, and
waste materials such as viruses.
Rats
Carry Disease
We
hear this statement made by professionals and laymen all the time.
It's totally innacurate. Disease is a complex condition of the
body. A rat does not walk into a room, and leave a complex
condition of the body on the floor, for someone to pick up. When I
learned this, I said "Oh Rats!".
goback
wikiwiki
this
space reserved
